En Ekaterimburgo, Rusia, el zar Nicolás II y su familia son ejecutados por los bolcheviques, lo que pone fin a la dinastía Romanov de tres siglos de antigüedad.
Nicolás
Coronado en 1896, Nicolás no estaba entrenado ni inclinado a gobernar, lo que no ayudó a la autocracia que buscaba preservar entre un pueblo desesperado por el cambio. El desastroso resultado de la Guerra Ruso-Japonesa llevó a la Revolución Rusa de 1905, que terminó solo después de que Nicolás aprobara una asamblea representativa, la Duma, y prometiera reformas constitucionales. El zar pronto se retractó de estas concesiones y disolvió repetidamente la Duma cuando se le opuso, contribuyendo al creciente apoyo público a los bolcheviques y otros grupos revolucionarios. En 1914, Nicolás llevó a su país a otra guerra costosa, la Primera Guerra Mundial, que Rusia no estaba preparada para ganar. El descontento creció a medida que escaseaban los alimentos, los soldados se cansaron de la guerra y las devastadoras derrotas a manos de Alemania demostraron la ineficacia de Rusia bajo Nicolás.
En marzo de 1917, estalló la revolución en las calles de Petrogrado (ahora San Petersburgo) y Nicolás se vio obligado a abdicar de su trono ese mismo mes. Ese noviembre, los bolcheviques socialistas radicales, dirigidos por Vladimir Lenin, tomaron el poder en Rusia del gobierno provisional, pidieron la paz con las potencias centrales y se dispusieron a establecer el primer estado comunista del mundo. La guerra civil estalló en Rusia en junio de 1918, y en julio las fuerzas rusas “blancas” antibolcheviques avanzaron sobre Ekaterimburgo, donde se encontraban Nicolás y su familia, durante una campaña contra las fuerzas bolcheviques. Se ordenó a las autoridades locales que impidieran el rescate de los Romanov y, tras una reunión secreta del Soviet de Ekaterimburgo, se dictó una sentencia de muerte contra la familia imperial.
Lenin
A última hora de la noche del 16 de julio, se ordenó a Nicolás, Alejandra, sus cinco hijos y cuatro sirvientes que se vistieran rápidamente y bajaran al sótano de la casa en la que estaban detenidos. Allí, la familia y los sirvientes se organizaron en dos filas para una fotografía que les dijeron que se estaba tomando para sofocar los rumores de que habían escapado. De repente, una docena de hombres armados irrumpieron en la habitación y mataron a tiros a la familia imperial en una lluvia de disparos. Aquellos que aún respiraban cuando el humo desapareció fueron apuñalados hasta la muerte.
Los restos de Nicholas, Alexandra y tres de sus hijos fueron excavados en un bosque cerca de Ekaterimburgo en 1991 y se identificaron positivamente dos años después mediante huellas dactilares de ADN. El príncipe heredero Alexei y una hija de Romanov no fueron contabilizados, alimentando la leyenda persistente de que Anastasia, la hija más joven de los Romanov, había sobrevivido a la ejecución de su familia. De las varias “Anastasias” que surgieron en Europa en la década posterior a la Revolución Rusa, Anna Anderson, que murió en Estados Unidos en 1984, fue la más convincente. En 1994, sin embargo, los científicos utilizaron ADN para demostrar que Anna Anderson no era la hija del zar, sino una mujer polaca llamada Franziska Schanzkowska.
Everybody can earn $500 Daily… Yes! you can earn more than you think by working online from home. I have been doing this job for like a few weeks and my last week payment was exactly $12537 dollars.
Change Your Life Right Now! Work From Comfort Of Your Home And Receive Your First Paycheck Within A Week. No Experience Needed, No Boss Over Your Shoulder… Say Goodbye To Your Old Job! Limited Number Of Spots Open… Find out how HERE……. http://gg.gg/Jobshere1
Коммунистические убийцы так себя ведут. Они гангстеры и так думают. Если они оставят детей в живых, возможно, когда они вырастут, они отомстят и тем самым создадут для них проблемы. Это самая садистская история в истории моей страны.
glad i found this. For the longest time ive wanted to know just the basis of what happened and who the Tzar was that led to their murder, and even though i tried researching there was always so much information that just didn’t tell me what i needed to know. thank you for posting this.
Los asesinos de la familia del Zar tuvieron su justo castigo: Lenin el que ordeno la ejecucion murió con una parálisis cerebral, Trotsky el que planeo la ejecución fue asesinado en México con un picotazo en la cabeza, los asesinos ejecutores fueron exterminado por las purgas de Stalin
The Russian Revolution and The French Revolution are very similar in a few ways. Incompetent King, Really Disgruntled Poor Class, and they both First Fell to another Incompetent Government leading to a violent form of government taking power and executing the former monarchs so no European Powers could put said royal family back on the throne. History Repeats Itself.
Nicolas II had already abdicated, the execution of him and his family was pointless retribution, they could have been exiled like the Hohenzollerns, but no, this only lead to the deaths of 20-60 million people under the Soviet Union
Это отвратительно, я так понимаю, желая отомстить Николасу, но не его жене и детям? Нет. К этому моменту он уже отрекся от престола. Дети сильно пострадали там и были убиты, их выстрелили до кровотечения, а затем закололи штыками по голове. Как никто не может понять, что это отвратительно?
The Romanov’s: Czar Nicholas II of Russia and his family are rather infamous. They were overthrown in the Russian Revolution and were executed on July 17th 1918 by bayonets or firing squad. Was this justice?
The Romanov line was not totally innocent of crimes, but they were for the most part naive to the Russian Revolution of 1917.
It was not Justice to kill children, teenagers really, by a Bolshevik firing squad. Prince Alexi, and Princess Anastasia, Tatiana, Olga, and Maria were innocent of the crimes their parents were charged with. They were naive to what their father Czar Nicholas II was facing, and to my knowledge did not commit crimes worthy of death. The Romanov line was brutally murdered by a Russian firing squad, that in the process bayoneted or shot innocent children. Their execution was unfair and unjust. If it was inevitable, there should have been a fair trial held before a criminal court. They should have had adequate lawyers and a fair judge, not be hastened into a basement and brutally murdered.
I’m going to keep my argument short given that I am running out of time, and I have other obligations at the moment.
I am going to be arguing that the offenses of the Czar (or Tsar) were too great and that the seemingly immoral execution of him and his family was for the betterment of the Russian people.
The history of the former Czar of Russia is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world (Dec of Ind. reference :D)
1. The Czar Nicholas II was known amongst his peers as Nicholas the Bloody after several vicious events that were related to his rule. The Khondynka Tragedy is one such event. At this Khondynka Tragedy over 1,000 citizens were stampeded to death at the coronation of Nicholas II. While it is unsure that it is a direct result of the coronation, it is most likely. Another event was the Bloody Sunday which occurred when the Imperial Guard shot upon protesters who were attempting to present a petition to the Czar
2. Nicholas II was also infamous for his anti-semitism. Nicholas II was the initiator of many violent pogroms against Jews resulting in over 4,000 deaths and an additional 10,000 injuries for little reason outside of discriminating against Jews.
Further evidence of his anti-semitism was shown in this quote: “He had a particular animus for the Jews. When Stolypin, the chairman of the Council of Ministers 1906-11, proposed to relax certain restrictions imposed on the Jews in the Pale of Settlement, the tsar replied: ‘In spite of the most convincing arguments in favour of an affirmative decision in this matter, an inner voice ever more insistently confirms that I should not take this decision upon myself. So far my conscience has never deceived me. Therefore in this case also, I intend to follow its dictates.’ Not for nothing did the tsar become a member of the anti-Semitic Union of the Russian People, subscribe to the Union’s funds and receive its president, Dr Dubrovin, on friendly terms. He had no sympathy for the victims of the pogroms that followed the publication of the Manifesto of October 1905. On the contrary, he saw in them a revolt against ‘the impertinence’ of the socialists and revolutionaries”
3. Nicholas II also was infamous for his execution of political opponents, especially the Social Democrats
Now the major concern in this situation is not the assassination/execution of Nicholas II, but the execution of the remainder of his family. If the removal of Nicholas II was for the better of society, it is clear that the removal of the royal family would help the entire country. While admittedly the new Soviet government did not significantly improve the situation, at the moment it would be considered justice to the Russian people.
tippy hearns
posted on July 16, 2021
I had no idea that Nicholas II was Anti-Jewish. That is crazy. Be that as it may, I do not think that killing his entire family was a good idea still. Nicholas II could have been executed for his crimes against Jews, Russians and everyone and that I don’t think would have been a huge problem, because it would be for crimes against the state. However, killing his entire family was not good. Who says that all of the family was Anti-Semitic or guilty of the death of the innocents? I believe that Nicholas children and his wife did not or could not know what their father did. They did not deserve to be executed like their father.
vlogger13
posted on July 16, 2021
The primary issue with keeping the Royal Family alive is that they will constantly pose a threat to the newly established Soviet Union. Their will always be the possibility that at least one of the members will rise up in rebellion to claim the throne. Now it is clear that this is not in the best interests of the Soviet Union however what really matters is if this is in the best interests of the people of Russia or not. To answer this, we must see what percentage of the population supported Lenin as opposed to the Tsar. This is not exactly a set in stone number, however it can be assumed that since the Tsar had been so abusive towards his people the people would be more likely to support Lenin. While in truth Lenin did not truly have the full support over the Russian people in 1918 when he overthrew the tsar, given that he had only true control over the slice of land between Moscow and the European border, while everything else was essentially under anarchy. However we see that after Lenin destroyed the White Rebelion in 1921 the majority of the people of Russia supported Lenin
tippy hearns
posted on July 16, 2021
Your points are very valid, and I agree with most of them, like the threat to the throne the children would pose.
However, I think the only reason people supported Lenin is because they were forced to. Communism often forces people to support them (North Korea for instance). The majority of Russia was probably more harassed by the socialists/communists than they were under Czar Nicholas II. I think that the Czar was naive and unable to understand that his throne was at stake. Thus, my argument for Round 4 is: The Romanov family was naive, and while killing them removed a threat to the throne, they should have been allowed a fair trial.
vlogger13
posted on July 16, 2021
The point about giving the family a fair trial is valid, however under the new Communist regime it would pose many problems. For one Communism states that every person is to be considered as equal and no priviledges are to be granted to anybody. Therefore giving the Romanovs a trial would be incredibly hypocritical given that none of the other Soviet citizens were given any form of a trial.
True, murdering the royal family may seem extreme, however in Lenin’s point of view, he had no other option. I have shown that keeping them alive was politically unwise given that their was always the possibility that the Romanovs may rebel against his new and fragile Soviet rule. However by showing them mercy and granting them a trial (one that the Romanovs would most certainly lose mind you) he would be breaking the very fundamentals of Communism. It would either be to grant everyone a fair trial, something Lenin certainly didn’t want to do as it lessened the power of the government, or not give the royal family a trial at all.
tippy hearns
posted on July 16, 2021
A fair trial would undermine the value of communism, but at least it would give the children a chance. Some of them, in fact probably all of them did not understand what their father and mother were doing, and for this I pity them. They were brutally executed, and they had no chance to stand trial fairly and justly. Communism would have been shaken, yes, but I think that if the royal family was not well liked V. Lenin would have been able to keep his life and sanity. Also, I concede that most of your arguments have won me over, but the fact remains about the children. Is it possible that the children could have stood trial, or maybe, just maybe, should have been smuggled out to another nation to live in peace?
vlogger13
posted on July 16, 2021
In no way am I attempting to justify the execution of the Romanov family, and I do not agree with Communist ideals. However, if we are to analyze the options presented to Lenin at the time, the choice was simple. His sole options were:
1) Execute the entire Romanov family so as to eliminate the threat of their existence.
2) Hold a trial while undermining the ideals of his totalitarian system.
I got $ 97450 up to now this year working on the online and I’m a full time student. I’AM profited. It’s really simple to know and I’m in order that cheerful that I got some answers regarding it.
Here what I do —- >>> http://Www.Pays99.Com
◙
En Ekaterimburgo, Rusia, el zar Nicolás II y su familia son ejecutados por los bolcheviques, lo que pone fin a la dinastía Romanov de tres siglos de antigüedad.
Coronado en 1896, Nicolás no estaba entrenado ni inclinado a gobernar, lo que no ayudó a la autocracia que buscaba preservar entre un pueblo desesperado por el cambio. El desastroso resultado de la Guerra Ruso-Japonesa llevó a la Revolución Rusa de 1905, que terminó solo después de que Nicolás aprobara una asamblea representativa, la Duma, y prometiera reformas constitucionales. El zar pronto se retractó de estas concesiones y disolvió repetidamente la Duma cuando se le opuso, contribuyendo al creciente apoyo público a los bolcheviques y otros grupos revolucionarios. En 1914, Nicolás llevó a su país a otra guerra costosa, la Primera Guerra Mundial, que Rusia no estaba preparada para ganar. El descontento creció a medida que escaseaban los alimentos, los soldados se cansaron de la guerra y las devastadoras derrotas a manos de Alemania demostraron la ineficacia de Rusia bajo Nicolás.
En marzo de 1917, estalló la revolución en las calles de Petrogrado (ahora San Petersburgo) y Nicolás se vio obligado a abdicar de su trono ese mismo mes. Ese noviembre, los bolcheviques socialistas radicales, dirigidos por Vladimir Lenin, tomaron el poder en Rusia del gobierno provisional, pidieron la paz con las potencias centrales y se dispusieron a establecer el primer estado comunista del mundo. La guerra civil estalló en Rusia en junio de 1918, y en julio las fuerzas rusas “blancas” antibolcheviques avanzaron sobre Ekaterimburgo, donde se encontraban Nicolás y su familia, durante una campaña contra las fuerzas bolcheviques. Se ordenó a las autoridades locales que impidieran el rescate de los Romanov y, tras una reunión secreta del Soviet de Ekaterimburgo, se dictó una sentencia de muerte contra la familia imperial.
A última hora de la noche del 16 de julio, se ordenó a Nicolás, Alejandra, sus cinco hijos y cuatro sirvientes que se vistieran rápidamente y bajaran al sótano de la casa en la que estaban detenidos. Allí, la familia y los sirvientes se organizaron en dos filas para una fotografía que les dijeron que se estaba tomando para sofocar los rumores de que habían escapado. De repente, una docena de hombres armados irrumpieron en la habitación y mataron a tiros a la familia imperial en una lluvia de disparos. Aquellos que aún respiraban cuando el humo desapareció fueron apuñalados hasta la muerte.
Los restos de Nicholas, Alexandra y tres de sus hijos fueron excavados en un bosque cerca de Ekaterimburgo en 1991 y se identificaron positivamente dos años después mediante huellas dactilares de ADN. El príncipe heredero Alexei y una hija de Romanov no fueron contabilizados, alimentando la leyenda persistente de que Anastasia, la hija más joven de los Romanov, había sobrevivido a la ejecución de su familia. De las varias “Anastasias” que surgieron en Europa en la década posterior a la Revolución Rusa, Anna Anderson, que murió en Estados Unidos en 1984, fue la más convincente. En 1994, sin embargo, los científicos utilizaron ADN para demostrar que Anna Anderson no era la hija del zar, sino una mujer polaca llamada Franziska Schanzkowska.
PrisioneroEnArgentina.com
Julio 16, 2021
31 thoughts on “La Ejecución de los Romanov”
-
- John llardx
- posted on July 19, 2021
-
- Anonymous
- posted on July 18, 2021
-
- eva jackson
- posted on July 17, 2021
-
- Anonymous
- posted on July 16, 2021
-
- El Gran Covid
- posted on July 16, 2021
-
- Шаша Шишкова
- posted on July 16, 2021
-
- leandro magezziani
- posted on July 16, 2021
-
- james kuplika
- posted on July 16, 2021
-
- willie kullanc
- posted on July 16, 2021
-
- alina de la fuente
- posted on July 16, 2021
-
- rodolfo.presente
- posted on July 16, 2021
-
- Soy del Depo
- posted on July 16, 2021
-
- cami rodriguez
- posted on July 16, 2021
-
- morgan.lee
- posted on July 16, 2021
-
- el agente de pipon
- posted on July 16, 2021
-
- joe_verdrieben
- posted on July 16, 2021
-
- Gary Aquize
- posted on July 16, 2021
-
- cynthia.macbride
- posted on July 16, 2021
-
- Lauren Lokney
- posted on July 16, 2021
-
- Гитара с нуля- уроки игры на гитаре
- posted on July 16, 2021
-
- tippy hearns
- posted on July 16, 2021
-
- vlogger13
- posted on July 16, 2021
-
- tippy hearns
- posted on July 16, 2021
-
- clark bass
- posted on July 16, 2021
-
- tippy hearns
- posted on July 16, 2021
-
- vlogger13
- posted on July 16, 2021
-
- tippy hearns
- posted on July 16, 2021
-
- vlogger13
- posted on July 16, 2021
-
- tippy hearns
- posted on July 16, 2021
-
- vlogger13
- posted on July 16, 2021
-
- north
- posted on July 16, 2021
CommentHistory of Communism… re red blood
Everybody can earn $500 Daily… Yes! you can earn more than you think by working online from home. I have been doing this job for like a few weeks and my last week payment was exactly $12537 dollars.
See More Info…………… https://www.paybuzz1.com
SAD SAD HISTORY
Change Your Life Right Now! Work From Comfort Of Your Home And Receive Your First Paycheck Within A Week. No Experience Needed, No Boss Over Your Shoulder… Say Goodbye To Your Old Job! Limited Number Of Spots Open… Find out how HERE……. http://gg.gg/Jobshere1
Esperemos que esta vez la gente se de cuenta lo que es el comunismo
Коммунистические убийцы так себя ведут. Они гангстеры и так думают. Если они оставят детей в живых, возможно, когда они вырастут, они отомстят и тем самым создадут для них проблемы. Это самая садистская история в истории моей страны.
Tribunales comunistas y punto
glad i found this. For the longest time ive wanted to know just the basis of what happened and who the Tzar was that led to their murder, and even though i tried researching there was always so much information that just didn’t tell me what i needed to know. thank you for posting this.
Odd how so many Monarchies end In the Slaughter of their entire lineage.
Es inconcebible todas las muertes, pero peor los chicos.
Hicieron bien. Esos mocosos estaban malcriados y merecían morir.
Dios te perdone.
Como dicen ustedes: que boludo, Rodolfo.
Killing the children were so wrong than toss their bodies in the woods like trash was even worse
Los asesinos de la familia del Zar tuvieron su justo castigo: Lenin el que ordeno la ejecucion murió con una parálisis cerebral, Trotsky el que planeo la ejecución fue asesinado en México con un picotazo en la cabeza, los asesinos ejecutores fueron exterminado por las purgas de Stalin
To destroy a monarchy, you have to end the bloodline. It sounds cruel but it is just like that.
The Russian Revolution and The French Revolution are very similar in a few ways. Incompetent King, Really Disgruntled Poor Class, and they both First Fell to another Incompetent Government leading to a violent form of government taking power and executing the former monarchs so no European Powers could put said royal family back on the throne. History Repeats Itself.
It breaks my heart just to think how they hoped to leave the prison the night they were woken up to be executed
Nicolas II had already abdicated, the execution of him and his family was pointless retribution, they could have been exiled like the Hohenzollerns, but no, this only lead to the deaths of 20-60 million people under the Soviet Union
Это отвратительно, я так понимаю, желая отомстить Николасу, но не его жене и детям? Нет. К этому моменту он уже отрекся от престола. Дети сильно пострадали там и были убиты, их выстрелили до кровотечения, а затем закололи штыками по голове. Как никто не может понять, что это отвратительно?
The Romanov’s: Czar Nicholas II of Russia and his family are rather infamous. They were overthrown in the Russian Revolution and were executed on July 17th 1918 by bayonets or firing squad. Was this justice?
The Romanovs were immoral.
The Romanov line was not totally innocent of crimes, but they were for the most part naive to the Russian Revolution of 1917.
It was not Justice to kill children, teenagers really, by a Bolshevik firing squad. Prince Alexi, and Princess Anastasia, Tatiana, Olga, and Maria were innocent of the crimes their parents were charged with. They were naive to what their father Czar Nicholas II was facing, and to my knowledge did not commit crimes worthy of death. The Romanov line was brutally murdered by a Russian firing squad, that in the process bayoneted or shot innocent children. Their execution was unfair and unjust. If it was inevitable, there should have been a fair trial held before a criminal court. They should have had adequate lawyers and a fair judge, not be hastened into a basement and brutally murdered.
I’m going to keep my argument short given that I am running out of time, and I have other obligations at the moment.
I am going to be arguing that the offenses of the Czar (or Tsar) were too great and that the seemingly immoral execution of him and his family was for the betterment of the Russian people.
The history of the former Czar of Russia is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world (Dec of Ind. reference :D)
1. The Czar Nicholas II was known amongst his peers as Nicholas the Bloody after several vicious events that were related to his rule. The Khondynka Tragedy is one such event. At this Khondynka Tragedy over 1,000 citizens were stampeded to death at the coronation of Nicholas II. While it is unsure that it is a direct result of the coronation, it is most likely. Another event was the Bloody Sunday which occurred when the Imperial Guard shot upon protesters who were attempting to present a petition to the Czar
2. Nicholas II was also infamous for his anti-semitism. Nicholas II was the initiator of many violent pogroms against Jews resulting in over 4,000 deaths and an additional 10,000 injuries for little reason outside of discriminating against Jews.
Further evidence of his anti-semitism was shown in this quote: “He had a particular animus for the Jews. When Stolypin, the chairman of the Council of Ministers 1906-11, proposed to relax certain restrictions imposed on the Jews in the Pale of Settlement, the tsar replied: ‘In spite of the most convincing arguments in favour of an affirmative decision in this matter, an inner voice ever more insistently confirms that I should not take this decision upon myself. So far my conscience has never deceived me. Therefore in this case also, I intend to follow its dictates.’ Not for nothing did the tsar become a member of the anti-Semitic Union of the Russian People, subscribe to the Union’s funds and receive its president, Dr Dubrovin, on friendly terms. He had no sympathy for the victims of the pogroms that followed the publication of the Manifesto of October 1905. On the contrary, he saw in them a revolt against ‘the impertinence’ of the socialists and revolutionaries”
3. Nicholas II also was infamous for his execution of political opponents, especially the Social Democrats
Now the major concern in this situation is not the assassination/execution of Nicholas II, but the execution of the remainder of his family. If the removal of Nicholas II was for the better of society, it is clear that the removal of the royal family would help the entire country. While admittedly the new Soviet government did not significantly improve the situation, at the moment it would be considered justice to the Russian people.
I had no idea that Nicholas II was Anti-Jewish. That is crazy. Be that as it may, I do not think that killing his entire family was a good idea still. Nicholas II could have been executed for his crimes against Jews, Russians and everyone and that I don’t think would have been a huge problem, because it would be for crimes against the state. However, killing his entire family was not good. Who says that all of the family was Anti-Semitic or guilty of the death of the innocents? I believe that Nicholas children and his wife did not or could not know what their father did. They did not deserve to be executed like their father.
The primary issue with keeping the Royal Family alive is that they will constantly pose a threat to the newly established Soviet Union. Their will always be the possibility that at least one of the members will rise up in rebellion to claim the throne. Now it is clear that this is not in the best interests of the Soviet Union however what really matters is if this is in the best interests of the people of Russia or not. To answer this, we must see what percentage of the population supported Lenin as opposed to the Tsar. This is not exactly a set in stone number, however it can be assumed that since the Tsar had been so abusive towards his people the people would be more likely to support Lenin. While in truth Lenin did not truly have the full support over the Russian people in 1918 when he overthrew the tsar, given that he had only true control over the slice of land between Moscow and the European border, while everything else was essentially under anarchy. However we see that after Lenin destroyed the White Rebelion in 1921 the majority of the people of Russia supported Lenin
Your points are very valid, and I agree with most of them, like the threat to the throne the children would pose.
However, I think the only reason people supported Lenin is because they were forced to. Communism often forces people to support them (North Korea for instance). The majority of Russia was probably more harassed by the socialists/communists than they were under Czar Nicholas II. I think that the Czar was naive and unable to understand that his throne was at stake. Thus, my argument for Round 4 is: The Romanov family was naive, and while killing them removed a threat to the throne, they should have been allowed a fair trial.
The point about giving the family a fair trial is valid, however under the new Communist regime it would pose many problems. For one Communism states that every person is to be considered as equal and no priviledges are to be granted to anybody. Therefore giving the Romanovs a trial would be incredibly hypocritical given that none of the other Soviet citizens were given any form of a trial.
True, murdering the royal family may seem extreme, however in Lenin’s point of view, he had no other option. I have shown that keeping them alive was politically unwise given that their was always the possibility that the Romanovs may rebel against his new and fragile Soviet rule. However by showing them mercy and granting them a trial (one that the Romanovs would most certainly lose mind you) he would be breaking the very fundamentals of Communism. It would either be to grant everyone a fair trial, something Lenin certainly didn’t want to do as it lessened the power of the government, or not give the royal family a trial at all.
A fair trial would undermine the value of communism, but at least it would give the children a chance. Some of them, in fact probably all of them did not understand what their father and mother were doing, and for this I pity them. They were brutally executed, and they had no chance to stand trial fairly and justly. Communism would have been shaken, yes, but I think that if the royal family was not well liked V. Lenin would have been able to keep his life and sanity. Also, I concede that most of your arguments have won me over, but the fact remains about the children. Is it possible that the children could have stood trial, or maybe, just maybe, should have been smuggled out to another nation to live in peace?
In no way am I attempting to justify the execution of the Romanov family, and I do not agree with Communist ideals. However, if we are to analyze the options presented to Lenin at the time, the choice was simple. His sole options were:
1) Execute the entire Romanov family so as to eliminate the threat of their existence.
2) Hold a trial while undermining the ideals of his totalitarian system.
I got $ 97450 up to now this year working on the online and I’m a full time student. I’AM profited. It’s really simple to know and I’m in order that cheerful that I got some answers regarding it.
Here what I do —- >>> http://Www.Pays99.Com