El domingo pasado se desató un incendio en el hospital de niños San Roque de Paraná algo que se podía haber prevenido.
Las autoridades gubernamentales tienen pleno conocimiento de la desastrosa situación del sistema público de salud así que son tan responsables ellos como los anteriores funcionarios políticos kirchneristas.
Inmediatamente se supo que el fuego nació del mal estado de las instalaciones eléctricas del nosocomio.
Un bebe trasladado al hospital San Martín falleció y según versiones oficiales su deceso no fue producto del incendio.
La víctima fatal se encontraba internado en terapia intensiva y luego de consultar a varios profesionales de la salud puedo asegurar que para nada es saludable un traslado más aún en el momento donde reinó el caos.
“A un neonato cuando se lo saca de la incubadora al medio exterior inmediatamente pierde su temperatura ,por eso los traslados se realizan en UTI Neonatal, en unidades de alta complejidad ” comentó una profesional pediátrica del mismo hospital San Roque.
Este testimonio deja al descubierto que varios niños padecieron en forma directa las consecuencias del incendio.
Tamara Fontana
La imagen de una enfermera de pie en la calle sosteniendo a dos bebés en sus brazos fue la mejor demostración de la vocación por el trabajo y de las fallas en el plan de contingencia aplicado.
Hubo voluntad de todos los trabajadores y vecinos pero faltó eficiencia.
La enfermera Tamara Fontana tuvo que ser hospitalizada en el hospital San Martín por una intoxicación con monóxido de carbono.
La joven dio muestras de valentía arriesgando su vida al rescatar varios pacientes.
Tamara se convirtió en ejemplo a imitar.
Hasta llevó en su auto particular a algunos enfermos.
El siniestro se podía haber evitado si los responsables de la salud pública hicieran correctamente su labor.
Si el gobernador en vez de colocar a sus alcahuetes en puestos estratégicos implementara los prometidos cargos por concursos de méritos.
Quien escribe en el artículo periodístico publicado en prisioneroenargentina.com “La salud en estado crítico ” había denunciado los problemas del sistema eléctrico del hospital San Roque.
El martes 25 de abril del año 2.023 el hospital, por el lapso de 20 minutos, quedó a oscuras.
Para las reparaciones hubo que cortar parcialmente el suministro en varias oportunidades .
Esa noche se vivieron momentos dramáticos .
Suspendieron las cirugías programadas y perjudicó el normal desarrollo del resto de las actividades.
Desde el gobierno kirchnerista de Gustavo Bordet no existió respuesta concreta a la gravedad del asunto.
Hicieron reparaciones provisorias y el riesgo continuó latente .
La oposición representada por la diputada provincial Graciela Jaroslavsky (UCR) recién en el mes de septiembre presentó un pedido de informes solicitando explicaciones por los reiterados desperfectos eléctricos del hospital.
Nunca se comprometieron a denunciar para no quedar mal entre las castas!
Dirigiéndome a los funcionarios les vuelvo a decir que con poco pueden solucionar muchos problemas de la gente.
Aclaro, habiendo voluntad de por medio.
Conseguir turno médico es un calvario.
El hospital Santa Rosa de Villaguay tratando de mejorar el trámite cambió el horario de solicitud de las 6 a la hora 8.
Esta medida es inútil, la gente tiene la necesidad de ir a horas de la madrugada y el amontonamiento es más grande.
Enfermeros entregados a los jefes políticos de turno por sus mismos representantes gremiales son obligados a trabajar ocho horas “corridas ” y con sueldos tan magros que muchos se esfuerzan haciendo otras ocho horas en el ámbito privado o municipal.
Grieve
Las guardias médicas que no se cumplen son una irregularidad difícil de desterrar por propia ineptitud gubernamental al no incentivar las carreras relacionadas a la medicina.
Sancionar al profesional acarrea otro problema, tal vez no haya quien pueda reemplazarlo.
Es casi imposible enumerar la cantidad de irregularidades cometidas dentro de la salud pública.
Mención aparte merece el Ministro de Salud Guillermo Grieve quien parece vivir en otra realidad .
” No hubo lesionados directos a raíz del hecho ” expresó en conferencia de prensa al mismo tiempo que amigos de Tamara Fontana, la enfermera intoxicada, pedían cadena de oración a través de las redes sociales.
Una “tomada de pelos ” repudiable.
Un dato no menor es que Grieve es socio del Centro de Atención Integral y Cuidados Especiales ( Caice) y prestador del Instituto Obra Social de la provincia de Entre Ríos (IOSPER) encontrándose en ambos lados del “mostrador” algo para nada ético.
Un acto de total irresponsabilidad sería la continuidad de Grieve en su cargo.
La salud pública entrerriana cada día se cobra nuevas víctimas.
Funcionarios incapaces e insensibles.
A nadie de este y del anterior gobierno le preocupa la salud de la gente.
Lo peor del caso son aquellas desgracias ocultadas que jamás encontrarán justicia.
Biden was going to lose. I think Kamala has way more chances.
Captain America
9 months ago
All states are part of the Union and have equal recognition under the Constitution.
One vote each = one elector each. Elected by each state without participation of Republicans, Democrats, Independents or other parties from across the Union. Only state parties.
The 50 electors must choose the POTUS from among the best governors.
Germán Monzón
9 months ago
Yo llamaria a elecciones para contratar a un presidente extranjero.
Nico Massanti
9 months ago
La UCR es un cancer como el peronchismo Kirchnerista
Pezuña
9 months ago
Con las listas sabanas siempre nos garch……………………………..
pulga_castro_22
9 months ago
Los radicales son Brutus.
Uriel Medina
9 months ago
Pero cuanta plata corrio por la universidad de las madres….
No quiero acusar por acusar por eso no quiero señalar a la Hebe, pero que alguien se la levo con pala…
ignacio zamora
9 months ago
Biden se dio cuenta a tiempo.
Stalin Castillejos
9 months ago
Yo estoy con Maria Corina. Espero sinceramente que no escape como Edmundo.
I don’t want everybody to vote. Elections are not won, by the majority of the people…In fact, our leverage in elections, quite candidly, goes up as the voting populous goes down
Richard:The Electoral College was almost abolished in the year 1970 with bipartisan support from both Republicans & Democrats. President Richard Nixon even endorsed the amendment to replace the system with a two round vote system. It looked like 3/4ths of the state were going to ratified the amendment and it did pass in the house unanimously; but was filibustered in the Senate by Southern lawmakers who feared that with a direct election for president than African Americans in the south would count equally to white voters.
Without the electoral college, democratic candidates would be forced to campaign in Texas, where half the population votes democratic, while the Republican candidate would be obligated to campaign in California, where there are millions of Republican voters. Both would need to visit small states, because every vote would count. Let’s ditch the Electoral College.
the founders feared someone like Julius Caesar who endangered the republic despite unanimous popularity. In such a situation they wanted the electoral college to have the power to deny such a person a win by vote. I believe they called it “tyranny of the majority?” Personally, I think it was adequate for the early 1800’s but after that if such a scenario would happen such a decision by the electoral college would likely result in Civil War. Personally, I think the founders’ fears of which was worse, tyranny of the majority or Tyranny of the minority, actually is demonstrated pretty well when you see how the House of Representatives vs the Senate was set up in how they represented voters.
One way to reform the Electoral College, would be rather than a state giving all their electoral votes, they proportionally represent their state, in other words, states would be able to show their voting pattern which is reflected in the Electoral College. Basically, if California for example distributed its 55 electoral votes to reflect the republican supporting counties and the democrat supporting ones. It would (I word it cautiously), in an ideal world probably better reflect the popular vote
That’s how it originally was. But, sometime early in the 1800s Tennessee (as I recall it being that particular state) went to a winner take all for its electorates to shore up its power as a state within the union. James Madison, who is considered a major architect of our Constitution protested it saying that it wasn’t the original intent. But, the Supreme Court ruled in Tennessee’s favor forcing most all the other states to do the same thing in order to insure they had as equal a voice to Tennessee’s in the Federal Government. The biggest obstacle to reforming the Electoral College isn’t so much the politicians in Washington as it is each individual state wanting to keep a sense of power in a Federal Republic. That is a government that is made up of individual autonomous or at least semi-autonomous governments working together. so, proportioning the Electoral votes would be going back to the original intent. After further research, I found that Alexander Hamilton went so far as to try to put in a Constitutional Amendment that would ensure the Electoral College would be determined by district and not by state.
this leads to my (admittedly mediocre) solution: ranked choice voting in winner take all systems. An easy sell for current politicians, and hopefully it breaks up the duopoly by removing wasting votes by third party. Then, candidates just need to be willing to wield their electoral votes to cobble majorities, and the system is at least better, and better able to move further forward
To win a majority of the population, you’d have to win the top 40 cities and their suburbs. And you can’t win them by a simple majority. You have to win them by 100%. There is no city that goes 100% for a candidate let alone suburbs. St. Louis city went 80% for Clinton, but the metropolitan area as a whole went to Trump. Even if you only focused on those 40 metro areas, that covers a wider range geographically than candidates typically do now. You have to keep in mind, there are many metro areas that extend into 2 or even 3 states. I have lived in 2 separate metro areas that extended into 3 states.
2 separate metro areas that extended into 3 states.’ that is something unique to the New England area, with Kansas City being an exemption. This is not something you find in Los Angeles, CA, Chicago, IL, Houston, TX, Phoenix, AZ, San Antonio, TX, San Diego, CA, Dallas, TX, San Jose, CA and that’s just what I feel like posting here. The vast majority of the cities in the top 50 have greater metro areas that are in one and if you notice California, Texas, Florida are in here a lot, you are missing many states. In fact, you can get to get to 51% of the population by only adding up 9 states. Would you call 9/50 a covers a wider range geographically? And by looking for the URL for you I found that by 2040 it will be 8 states, so the problem will only get worse.
metro area or commuter belt, is a region consisting of a densely populated urban core and its less-populated surrounding territories, sharing industry, infrastructure, and housing. This seems way too broad but it agrees with you. This does include suburbs so I am assuming you have never been to the suburbs of Chicago. And because I currently live in one of the metro areas you mentioned I would have to disagree with how homogenous it is, but I have been wrong before, it just seems odd you want in increase representation by allowing candidates to go to fewer places.
I don’t mean to say that metro areas are homogenous themselves, but they are more likely to be closer together in thought than less urban areas or other metros of a state. 5 of the 6 largest counties in the Chicago metro area voted for Clinton for instance. Most suburbanites in the Chicago area vote Democrats, at least for President. This is actually a fairly recent development because they used to go Republican not that long ago. But what the Chicago area thinks has no bearing on what other metros in the state thing. For Illinois, it doesn’t matter that much because the Chicago metro is just a huge percentage of the population. I mainly wanted to touch on Chicago in this comment because you did. But take Florida, again. Metro Jacksonville is red, yet Metro Miami went blue. Houston’s metro area in Texas went Trump while El Paso’s went Clinton. This map is a good way to show how divided states can be.
Besides getting rid of the electoral college, the U.S. also needs to pass a law banning corporate campaign “donations” (i.e. legalized bribes) so that politicians stop serving corporate interests and CEOs and start serving the people who voted for them. That would end the current state of plutocratic, oligarchic corporatocracy, and turn the U.S. into a democracy.
○
Las autoridades gubernamentales tienen pleno conocimiento de la desastrosa situación del sistema público de salud así que son tan responsables ellos como los anteriores funcionarios políticos kirchneristas.
Inmediatamente se supo que el fuego nació del mal estado de las instalaciones eléctricas del nosocomio.
Un bebe trasladado al hospital San Martín falleció y según versiones oficiales su deceso no fue producto del incendio.
La víctima fatal se encontraba internado en terapia intensiva y luego de consultar a varios profesionales de la salud puedo asegurar que para nada es saludable un traslado más aún en el momento donde reinó el caos.
“A un neonato cuando se lo saca de la incubadora al medio exterior inmediatamente pierde su temperatura ,por eso los traslados se realizan en UTI Neonatal, en unidades de alta complejidad ” comentó una profesional pediátrica del mismo hospital San Roque.
Este testimonio deja al descubierto que varios niños padecieron en forma directa las consecuencias del incendio.
La imagen de una enfermera de pie en la calle sosteniendo a dos bebés en sus brazos fue la mejor demostración de la vocación por el trabajo y de las fallas en el plan de contingencia aplicado.
Hubo voluntad de todos los trabajadores y vecinos pero faltó eficiencia.
La enfermera Tamara Fontana tuvo que ser hospitalizada en el hospital San Martín por una intoxicación con monóxido de carbono.
La joven dio muestras de valentía arriesgando su vida al rescatar varios pacientes.
Tamara se convirtió en ejemplo a imitar.
Hasta llevó en su auto particular a algunos enfermos.
El siniestro se podía haber evitado si los responsables de la salud pública hicieran correctamente su labor.
Si el gobernador en vez de colocar a sus alcahuetes en puestos estratégicos implementara los prometidos cargos por concursos de méritos.
Quien escribe en el artículo periodístico publicado en prisioneroenargentina.com “La salud en estado crítico ” había denunciado los problemas del sistema eléctrico del hospital San Roque.
El martes 25 de abril del año 2.023 el hospital, por el lapso de 20 minutos, quedó a oscuras.
Para las reparaciones hubo que cortar parcialmente el suministro en varias oportunidades .
Esa noche se vivieron momentos dramáticos .
Suspendieron las cirugías programadas y perjudicó el normal desarrollo del resto de las actividades.
Desde el gobierno kirchnerista de Gustavo Bordet no existió respuesta concreta a la gravedad del asunto.
Hicieron reparaciones provisorias y el riesgo continuó latente .
La oposición representada por la diputada provincial Graciela Jaroslavsky (UCR) recién en el mes de septiembre presentó un pedido de informes solicitando explicaciones por los reiterados desperfectos eléctricos del hospital.
Nunca se comprometieron a denunciar para no quedar mal entre las castas!
Dirigiéndome a los funcionarios les vuelvo a decir que con poco pueden solucionar muchos problemas de la gente.
Aclaro, habiendo voluntad de por medio.
Conseguir turno médico es un calvario.
El hospital Santa Rosa de Villaguay tratando de mejorar el trámite cambió el horario de solicitud de las 6 a la hora 8.
Esta medida es inútil, la gente tiene la necesidad de ir a horas de la madrugada y el amontonamiento es más grande.
Enfermeros entregados a los jefes políticos de turno por sus mismos representantes gremiales son obligados a trabajar ocho horas “corridas ” y con sueldos tan magros que muchos se esfuerzan haciendo otras ocho horas en el ámbito privado o municipal.
Las guardias médicas que no se cumplen son una irregularidad difícil de desterrar por propia ineptitud gubernamental al no incentivar las carreras relacionadas a la medicina.
Sancionar al profesional acarrea otro problema, tal vez no haya quien pueda reemplazarlo.
Es casi imposible enumerar la cantidad de irregularidades cometidas dentro de la salud pública.
Mención aparte merece el Ministro de Salud Guillermo Grieve quien parece vivir en otra realidad .
” No hubo lesionados directos a raíz del hecho ” expresó en conferencia de prensa al mismo tiempo que amigos de Tamara Fontana, la enfermera intoxicada, pedían cadena de oración a través de las redes sociales.
Una “tomada de pelos ” repudiable.
Un dato no menor es que Grieve es socio del Centro de Atención Integral y Cuidados Especiales ( Caice) y prestador del Instituto Obra Social de la provincia de Entre Ríos (IOSPER) encontrándose en ambos lados del “mostrador” algo para nada ético.
Un acto de total irresponsabilidad sería la continuidad de Grieve en su cargo.
La salud pública entrerriana cada día se cobra nuevas víctimas.
Funcionarios incapaces e insensibles.
A nadie de este y del anterior gobierno le preocupa la salud de la gente.
Lo peor del caso son aquellas desgracias ocultadas que jamás encontrarán justicia.
Lo del hospital San Roque era un final anunciado.
PrisioneroEnArgentina.com
Agosto 10, 2024
Tags: Guillermo Grieve, Gustavo Bordet, Hospital San Roque, Tamara FontanaRelated Posts
Jueces a dedo
○ Por Carlos Furman. Los entrerrianos desde hace [...]
La ruta 20 y una estafa “interminable”
○ Por Carlos Furman. La República Argentina está [...]
Impunidad condicional
♦ Por Carlos Furman. El caso del actual [...]
NICE
[…] Made in USA […]
[…] Made in USA […]
[…] Made in USA […]
[…] Made in USA […]
[…] Made in USA […]
[…] Made in USA […]
[…] Made in USA […]
Entre quien entre son la misma bosta
Mientras existan politicos el pais no va a salir adelante
Sigan creyendo en Kamala, Corina, Cristina, Hilaria, son todas cortadas por la misma tijera. Además, el fin del mundo ha llegado. Vean la foto.
Nos fuimos la B hace rato
Van a tener que pasar unas cuantas generaciones hasta que no queden ni las cenzas de los ladrikirchneristas.
Juira las lstas sabana !!!!!!!!!!!
Muy buen artículo
Para ver hasta el final.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Je3yuzUcyzY
Biden was going to lose. I think Kamala has way more chances.
All states are part of the Union and have equal recognition under the Constitution.
One vote each = one elector each. Elected by each state without participation of Republicans, Democrats, Independents or other parties from across the Union. Only state parties.
The 50 electors must choose the POTUS from among the best governors.
Yo llamaria a elecciones para contratar a un presidente extranjero.
La UCR es un cancer como el peronchismo Kirchnerista
Con las listas sabanas siempre nos garch……………………………..
Los radicales son Brutus.
Pero cuanta plata corrio por la universidad de las madres….
No quiero acusar por acusar por eso no quiero señalar a la Hebe, pero que alguien se la levo con pala…
Biden se dio cuenta a tiempo.
Yo estoy con Maria Corina. Espero sinceramente que no escape como Edmundo.
Edmundo ya esta comodo con el ex rey juanca
Quien paga todos los gastos de este Sr. en España ?
That’s what trumps going to have to do with all the law fare
America needs to abolish electoral colleges. It is undemocratic.
We should have our candidates fight to the death in a cage match
Then, no need to vote
I don’t want everybody to vote. Elections are not won, by the majority of the people…In fact, our leverage in elections, quite candidly, goes up as the voting populous goes down
Richard: The Electoral College was almost abolished in the year 1970 with bipartisan support from both Republicans & Democrats. President Richard Nixon even endorsed the amendment to replace the system with a two round vote system. It looked like 3/4ths of the state were going to ratified the amendment and it did pass in the house unanimously; but was filibustered in the Senate by Southern lawmakers who feared that with a direct election for president than African Americans in the south would count equally to white voters.
the sweet smell of racism…
Without the electoral college, democratic candidates would be forced to campaign in Texas, where half the population votes democratic, while the Republican candidate would be obligated to campaign in California, where there are millions of Republican voters. Both would need to visit small states, because every vote would count. Let’s ditch the Electoral College.
This is why we should start teaching civics again..
the founders feared someone like Julius Caesar who endangered the republic despite unanimous popularity. In such a situation they wanted the electoral college to have the power to deny such a person a win by vote. I believe they called it “tyranny of the majority?” Personally, I think it was adequate for the early 1800’s but after that if such a scenario would happen such a decision by the electoral college would likely result in Civil War. Personally, I think the founders’ fears of which was worse, tyranny of the majority or Tyranny of the minority, actually is demonstrated pretty well when you see how the House of Representatives vs the Senate was set up in how they represented voters.
One way to reform the Electoral College, would be rather than a state giving all their electoral votes, they proportionally represent their state, in other words, states would be able to show their voting pattern which is reflected in the Electoral College. Basically, if California for example distributed its 55 electoral votes to reflect the republican supporting counties and the democrat supporting ones. It would (I word it cautiously), in an ideal world probably better reflect the popular vote
That’s how it originally was. But, sometime early in the 1800s Tennessee (as I recall it being that particular state) went to a winner take all for its electorates to shore up its power as a state within the union. James Madison, who is considered a major architect of our Constitution protested it saying that it wasn’t the original intent. But, the Supreme Court ruled in Tennessee’s favor forcing most all the other states to do the same thing in order to insure they had as equal a voice to Tennessee’s in the Federal Government. The biggest obstacle to reforming the Electoral College isn’t so much the politicians in Washington as it is each individual state wanting to keep a sense of power in a Federal Republic. That is a government that is made up of individual autonomous or at least semi-autonomous governments working together. so, proportioning the Electoral votes would be going back to the original intent. After further research, I found that Alexander Hamilton went so far as to try to put in a Constitutional Amendment that would ensure the Electoral College would be determined by district and not by state.
this leads to my (admittedly mediocre) solution: ranked choice voting in winner take all systems. An easy sell for current politicians, and hopefully it breaks up the duopoly by removing wasting votes by third party. Then, candidates just need to be willing to wield their electoral votes to cobble majorities, and the system is at least better, and better able to move further forward
I am sorry… they do that
To win a majority of the population, you’d have to win the top 40 cities and their suburbs. And you can’t win them by a simple majority. You have to win them by 100%. There is no city that goes 100% for a candidate let alone suburbs. St. Louis city went 80% for Clinton, but the metropolitan area as a whole went to Trump. Even if you only focused on those 40 metro areas, that covers a wider range geographically than candidates typically do now. You have to keep in mind, there are many metro areas that extend into 2 or even 3 states. I have lived in 2 separate metro areas that extended into 3 states.
2 separate metro areas that extended into 3 states.’ that is something unique to the New England area, with Kansas City being an exemption. This is not something you find in Los Angeles, CA, Chicago, IL, Houston, TX, Phoenix, AZ, San Antonio, TX, San Diego, CA, Dallas, TX, San Jose, CA and that’s just what I feel like posting here. The vast majority of the cities in the top 50 have greater metro areas that are in one and if you notice California, Texas, Florida are in here a lot, you are missing many states. In fact, you can get to get to 51% of the population by only adding up 9 states. Would you call 9/50 a covers a wider range geographically? And by looking for the URL for you I found that by 2040 it will be 8 states, so the problem will only get worse.
The Chicago area extends into 3 states. Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin.
metro area or commuter belt, is a region consisting of a densely populated urban core and its less-populated surrounding territories, sharing industry, infrastructure, and housing. This seems way too broad but it agrees with you. This does include suburbs so I am assuming you have never been to the suburbs of Chicago. And because I currently live in one of the metro areas you mentioned I would have to disagree with how homogenous it is, but I have been wrong before, it just seems odd you want in increase representation by allowing candidates to go to fewer places.
I don’t mean to say that metro areas are homogenous themselves, but they are more likely to be closer together in thought than less urban areas or other metros of a state. 5 of the 6 largest counties in the Chicago metro area voted for Clinton for instance.
Most suburbanites in the Chicago area vote Democrats, at least for President. This is actually a fairly recent development because they used to go Republican not that long ago. But what the Chicago area thinks has no bearing on what other metros in the state thing. For Illinois, it doesn’t matter that much because the Chicago metro is just a huge percentage of the population. I mainly wanted to touch on Chicago in this comment because you did.
But take Florida, again. Metro Jacksonville is red, yet Metro Miami went blue. Houston’s metro area in Texas went Trump while El Paso’s went Clinton. This map is a good way to show how divided states can be.
Besides getting rid of the electoral college, the U.S. also needs to pass a law banning corporate campaign “donations” (i.e. legalized bribes) so that politicians stop serving corporate interests and CEOs and start serving the people who voted for them. That would end the current state of plutocratic, oligarchic corporatocracy, and turn the U.S. into a democracy.
Of course they do
Es hora que las listas sabana desaparezcan.
Esas sabanas envuelven delincuentes.
La politica mundial se ha terminado de podrir.
The USA is no longer the world’s leading power. Neither nuclear nor economic.
And it is losing the cultural battle.