¿No sería este el famoso microchip?

Compañía sueca crea un dispositivo que almacena bajo la piel certificados de vacunación contra el covid-19
Share

💾

Los desarrolladores subrayan que esta tecnología es “pasiva”, por lo que no puede ser utilizada para rastrear la localización del usuario.

Epicenter, una empresa sueca especializada en la creación de tecnologías innovadoras, presentó recientemente un microchip que se puede insertar debajo de la piel para almacenar información sobre el estado de vacunación de la persona.

El implante consiste en un dispositivo NFC (Near Field Communications) cuyos datos pueden ser leídos por diversos aparatos, como teléfonos inteligentes y tabletas. Se trata de la misma tecnología que utilizan las tarjetas de crédito y otros sistemas de pago digital.

“Los implantes son una tecnología muy versátil que se puede utilizar para muchas cosas diferentes, y ahora mismo es muy cómodo tener el pasaporte covid siempre accesible”, dijo el jefe de distribución de Epicenter, Hannes Sjoblad. “En caso de que tu teléfono se quede sin batería, siempre estará accesible para ti”.

Sjoblad añadió que puede “ir a un restaurante o una sala de cine”, y simplemente hacer que escaneen su brazo con un teléfono inteligente para que en este aparezca el pasaporte de vacunación.

El empresario asegura que el implante es “completamente reversible” y no requiere una aplicación telefónica especial.

El chip se puede insertar en el brazo o entre el pulgar y el índice, y los datos son legibles a través de la piel. El archivo de pasaporte de vacunación es generado en la pantalla del dispositivo lector mediante un código único que posee el chip de cada individuo.

Sjoblad explicó que esta tecnología es “pasiva”, por lo que no puede ser utilizada para rastrear la localización de la persona.  

“Lo que me importa es que la gente que recibe implantes de chips lo hace de forma voluntaria”, subrayó. “Y porque tienen curiosidad y quieren trabajar con esta tecnología”.

Estos microchips cuestan 113 dólares. Epicenter organiza regularmente “eventos de implantes” para todo aquel que esté interesado en el concepto.

 


PrisioneroEnArgentina.com

Diciembre 25, 2021


 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest


3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
LeoLSmith
LeoLSmith
7 months ago

NICE

trackback

[…] Made in USA […]

trackback

[…] Made in USA […]

trackback

[…] Made in USA […]

trackback

[…] Made in USA […]

trackback

[…] Made in USA […]

trackback

[…] Made in USA […]

Sandra D'alessio
Sandra D'alessio
8 months ago

Entre quien entre son la misma bosta

Adrian Garrido
Adrian Garrido
8 months ago

Mientras existan politicos el pais no va a salir adelante

Patricio
Patricio
8 months ago

Sigan creyendo en Kamala, Corina, Cristina, Hilaria, son todas cortadas por la misma tijera. Además, el fin del mundo ha llegado. Vean la foto.

El-fin-del-mundo-ha-llegado
Nico
Nico
8 months ago

Nos fuimos la B hace rato

Marcelo S.
Marcelo S.
8 months ago

Van a tener que pasar unas cuantas generaciones hasta que no queden ni las cenzas de los ladrikirchneristas.

jorge zelaya 445566
jorge zelaya 445566
8 months ago

Juira las lstas sabana !!!!!!!!!!!

Jorge Di Pasquale
Jorge Di Pasquale
8 months ago

Muy buen artículo

Bizancio
Bizancio
8 months ago
Man from Overseas
Man from Overseas
8 months ago

Biden was going to lose. I think Kamala has way more chances.

Captain America
Captain America
8 months ago

All states are part of the Union and have equal recognition under the Constitution.
One vote each = one elector each. Elected by each state without participation of Republicans, Democrats, Independents or other parties from across the Union. Only state parties.

Captain America
Captain America
8 months ago

The 50 electors must choose the POTUS from among the best governors.

Germán Monzón
Germán Monzón
8 months ago

Yo llamaria a elecciones para contratar a un presidente extranjero.

Nico Massanti
Nico Massanti
8 months ago

La UCR es un cancer como el peronchismo Kirchnerista

Pezuña
Pezuña
8 months ago

Con las listas sabanas siempre nos garch……………………………..

pulga_castro_22
pulga_castro_22
8 months ago

Los radicales son Brutus.

Uriel Medina
Uriel Medina
8 months ago

Pero cuanta plata corrio por la universidad de las madres….
No quiero acusar por acusar por eso no quiero señalar a la Hebe, pero que alguien se la levo con pala…

ignacio zamora
ignacio zamora
8 months ago

Biden se dio cuenta a tiempo.

Stalin Castillejos
Stalin Castillejos
8 months ago

Yo estoy con Maria Corina. Espero sinceramente que no escape como Edmundo.

PABLO MINUCCI
PABLO MINUCCI
8 months ago

Edmundo ya esta comodo con el ex rey juanca

Aria Cermellon
Aria Cermellon
8 months ago
Reply to  PABLO MINUCCI

Quien paga todos los gastos de este Sr. en España ?

Lewis A. Mackay
Lewis A. Mackay
8 months ago
Reply to  Aria Cermellon

That’s what trumps going to have to do with all the law fare

Richard E. Andrews
Richard E. Andrews
8 months ago

America needs to abolish electoral colleges. It is undemocratic.

Cash Wilson
Cash Wilson
8 months ago

We should have our candidates fight to the death in a cage match
Then, no need to vote 🙂

Tommy Scottfield
Tommy Scottfield
8 months ago
Reply to  Cash Wilson

I don’t want everybody to vote. Elections are not won, by the majority of the people…In fact, our leverage in elections, quite candidly, goes up as the voting populous goes down

jack alexander
jack alexander
8 months ago

Richard: The Electoral College was almost abolished in the year 1970 with bipartisan support from both Republicans & Democrats. President Richard Nixon even endorsed the amendment to replace the system with a two round vote system. It looked like 3/4ths of the state were going to ratified the amendment and it did pass in the house unanimously; but was filibustered in the Senate by Southern lawmakers who feared that with a direct election for president than African Americans in the south would count equally to white voters.

donna pasciarotti
donna pasciarotti
8 months ago
Reply to  jack alexander

the sweet smell of racism…

pauline kottas
pauline kottas
8 months ago

Without the electoral college, democratic candidates would be forced to campaign in Texas, where half the population votes democratic, while the Republican candidate would be obligated to campaign in California, where there are millions of Republican voters. Both would need to visit small states, because every vote would count. Let’s ditch the Electoral College.

Thinking Out Loud
Thinking Out Loud
8 months ago
Reply to  pauline kottas

This is why we should start teaching civics again..

Matt
Matt
8 months ago

the founders feared someone like Julius Caesar who endangered the republic despite unanimous popularity. In such a situation they wanted the electoral college to have the power to deny such a person a win by vote. I believe they called it “tyranny of the majority?” Personally, I think it was adequate for the early 1800’s but after that if such a scenario would happen such a decision by the electoral college would likely result in Civil War. Personally, I think the founders’ fears of which was worse, tyranny of the majority or Tyranny of the minority, actually is demonstrated pretty well when you see how the House of Representatives vs the Senate was set up in how they represented voters.

Mark Axos
Mark Axos
8 months ago
Reply to  Matt

One way to reform the Electoral College, would be rather than a state giving all their electoral votes, they proportionally represent their state, in other words, states would be able to show their voting pattern which is reflected in the Electoral College. Basically, if California for example distributed its 55 electoral votes to reflect the republican supporting counties and the democrat supporting ones. It would (I word it cautiously), in an ideal world probably better reflect the popular vote

joe_verdrieben
joe_verdrieben
8 months ago
Reply to  Mark Axos

That’s how it originally was. But, sometime early in the 1800s Tennessee (as I recall it being that particular state) went to a winner take all for its electorates to shore up its power as a state within the union. James Madison, who is considered a major architect of our Constitution protested it saying that it wasn’t the original intent. But, the Supreme Court ruled in Tennessee’s favor forcing most all the other states to do the same thing in order to insure they had as equal a voice to Tennessee’s in the Federal Government. The biggest obstacle to reforming the Electoral College isn’t so much the politicians in Washington as it is each individual state wanting to keep a sense of power in a Federal Republic. That is a government that is made up of individual autonomous or at least semi-autonomous governments working together. so, proportioning the Electoral votes would be going back to the original intent. After further research, I found that Alexander Hamilton went so far as to try to put in a Constitutional Amendment that would ensure the Electoral College would be determined by district and not by state.

Mark Axos
Mark Axos
8 months ago
Reply to  joe_verdrieben

this leads to my (admittedly mediocre) solution: ranked choice voting in winner take all systems. An easy sell for current politicians, and hopefully it breaks up the duopoly by removing wasting votes by third party. Then, candidates just need to be willing to wield their electoral votes to cobble majorities, and the system is at least better, and better able to move further forward

Kevin Milone
Kevin Milone
8 months ago
Reply to  pauline kottas

I am sorry… they do that

Jeff Anderton
Jeff Anderton
8 months ago
Reply to  Kevin Milone

To win a majority of the population, you’d have to win the top 40 cities and their suburbs. And you can’t win them by a simple majority. You have to win them by 100%. There is no city that goes 100% for a candidate let alone suburbs. St. Louis city went 80% for Clinton, but the metropolitan area as a whole went to Trump. Even if you only focused on those 40 metro areas, that covers a wider range geographically than candidates typically do now. You have to keep in mind, there are many metro areas that extend into 2 or even 3 states. I have lived in 2 separate metro areas that extended into 3 states.

Karen Durso
Karen Durso
8 months ago
Reply to  Jeff Anderton

2 separate metro areas that extended into 3 states.’ that is something unique to the New England area, with Kansas City being an exemption. This is not something you find in Los Angeles, CA, Chicago, IL, Houston, TX, Phoenix, AZ, San Antonio, TX, San Diego, CA, Dallas, TX, San Jose, CA and that’s just what I feel like posting here. The vast majority of the cities in the top 50 have greater metro areas that are in one and if you notice California, Texas, Florida are in here a lot, you are missing many states. In fact, you can get to get to 51% of the population by only adding up 9 states. Would you call 9/50 a covers a wider range geographically? And by looking for the URL for you I found that by 2040 it will be 8 states, so the problem will only get worse.

Jennifer Corr^2008
Jennifer Corr^2008
8 months ago
Reply to  Karen Durso

The Chicago area extends into 3 states. Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin.

Karen Durso
Karen Durso
8 months ago

metro area or commuter belt, is a region consisting of a densely populated urban core and its less-populated surrounding territories, sharing industry, infrastructure, and housing. This seems way too broad but it agrees with you. This does include suburbs so I am assuming you have never been to the suburbs of Chicago. And because I currently live in one of the metro areas you mentioned I would have to disagree with how homogenous it is, but I have been wrong before, it just seems odd you want in increase representation by allowing candidates to go to fewer places.

Jennifer Corr^2008
Jennifer Corr^2008
8 months ago
Reply to  Karen Durso

I don’t mean to say that metro areas are homogenous themselves, but they are more likely to be closer together in thought than less urban areas or other metros of a state. 5 of the 6 largest counties in the Chicago metro area voted for Clinton for instance.
Most suburbanites in the Chicago area vote Democrats, at least for President. This is actually a fairly recent development because they used to go Republican not that long ago. But what the Chicago area thinks has no bearing on what other metros in the state thing. For Illinois, it doesn’t matter that much because the Chicago metro is just a huge percentage of the population. I mainly wanted to touch on Chicago in this comment because you did.
But take Florida, again. Metro Jacksonville is red, yet Metro Miami went blue. Houston’s metro area in Texas went Trump while El Paso’s went Clinton. This map is a good way to show how divided states can be.

Russell W.
Russell W.
8 months ago

Besides getting rid of the electoral college, the U.S. also needs to pass a law banning corporate campaign “donations” (i.e. legalized bribes) so that politicians stop serving corporate interests and CEOs and start serving the people who voted for them. That would end the current state of plutocratic, oligarchic corporatocracy, and turn the U.S. into a democracy.

mike granger _1965
mike granger _1965
8 months ago
Reply to  Kevin Milone

Of course they do

Sabrina Cossio
Sabrina Cossio
8 months ago

Es hora que las listas sabana desaparezcan.
Esas sabanas envuelven delincuentes.

German Piressi
German Piressi
8 months ago

La politica mundial se ha terminado de podrir.

Captain America
Captain America
8 months ago

The USA is no longer the world’s leading power. Neither nuclear nor economic.
And it is losing the cultural battle.

3
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x