Share

 

 

Entiendo que si dejamos un mensaje de no ceder ante los injustos, sentimos, esta familia Kussman, que así estaremos fuertes y con nuestro espíritu libre.

 

Los políticos parece que se burlan cuando hablan de justicia independiente y juicios justos. Ejemplo de esos dichos, el presidente Argentino Macri y German Garavano el ministro de “justicia y derechos humanos” (para algunos). No debería suponer, pero además de que muchos  terroristas en puestos de algún estamento del estado y otros que comulgan con la misma idea y  de los que se sienten presionados…o con miedo de perder su puestito por las exigencias de los DDHH que supimos conseguir. Este tema no lo arregla ni entrando a tallar… Lucifer.

 

Los de la “justicia” han sido extremadamente sádicos y cobardes, es imposible aceptar tanto abuso. Incumplen leyes internacionales, de las cuales Argentina es firmante aceptándolas. Nos redujeron a subhumanos mientras creen que por ser parte de ella, están en la categoría de dioses. También incluyo al legislativo que han retrotraído leyes para cavarnos la tumba.  No siendo delincuentes, la justicia, el estado y el legislativo  tensaron tanto el arco que la flecha disparada  nos atravesó el pecho,… no hay reparación. Ni aun muriendo hoy, porque nos han estigmatizado.

[ezcol_1half]

Mauricio Macri, Presidente de Argentina

[/ezcol_1half] [ezcol_1half_end]

Germán Garavano, Ministro de Justicia y Derechos Humanos (para algunos) en su despacho de la Ex ESMA.

[/ezcol_1half_end]

Se puede entender que un ciudadano de a pie confunda la condición de imputado con la de culpable. La presunción de inocencia es un principio básico. El Ministro de Justicia y DDHH lo sabe, los jueces lo saben, la corte suprema lo sabe, los jueces de  cámaras lo saben.  Y por qué el beneficio de esperar el juicio en libertad no se lo otorgan a mi esposo Claudio Alejandro Kussman? (Desde el día 28 de noviembre del año 2017 mi esposo está en un limbo ilegal. Ha superado los  cuatro años en prisión preventiva y  cumplirá el quinto año, el próximo 28 de noviembre). Entonces por qué se lo aplican a Cristina, a… Montoto… no, no, él está libre, fue el Montonero “Pascualito” su nombre de guerra y ahora controla con las pulseras, a los Prisioneros acusados de los mal llamados delitos de lesa humanidad. 

 

María Ferreyra de Kussman es esposa del  prisionero ilegal Claudio Alejandro Kussman. Comisario Mayor (R) de la Policía de la Provincia de Buenos Aires.

 

[ezcol_1fifth].[/ezcol_1fifth] [ezcol_3fifth]

“Si eres neutral en situaciones de injusticia,

has elegido el lado del opresor”

Desmond Tutu

[/ezcol_3fifth] [ezcol_1fifth_end].[/ezcol_1fifth_end]

Desmond Mpilo Tutu (desmon Mpilo ChitChi) clérigo y pacifista sudafricano que adquirió fama internacional durante la década de 1980 a causa de su lucha contra el Apartheid.(apartchaid) Tutu fue el primer sudafricano negro en ser elegido y ordenado como Arzobispo Anglicano de Ciudad del Cabo (Sudáfrica) y luego Primado de la entonces Iglesia de la Provincia de África Meridional (actualmente Iglesia Anglicana de África Meridional). Fue laureado con el Premio Nobel de laPaz en 1984.

 


PrisioneroEnArgentina.com

Julio 22, 2019


 

Tags: ,
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
14 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hermosa mañana
Hermosa mañana
1 year ago

Yo no soy de Milei, pero no se porque tanto quilombo con Margareth Thatcher. La tipa defendió su pais y les pasó el trapo a Galtieri y a todos nuestros heroes
Dejo afuera a los pibes que fueron los verdaderos heroes de Malvinas.

Juliette Okuma
Juliette Okuma
1 year ago

I would suggest though, that any claim or rule by Argentina would involve the right of Argentina to base their soldiers there. And as every inhabitant of Malvinas owns a gun, the cost to the Argentine state of garrisoning and ruling the islands would bankrupt the Argentine economy.

NOLAN FOSTER and DECLAN JAMESON
NOLAN FOSTER and DECLAN JAMESON
1 year ago

It’s only a “problem” for the Argies. For the record, the British were actually there first. Argentina is an economic basket case (thank you, Juan Peron). It uses the Falkland issue to divert its suffering citizens from their dim economic prospects

juan carlos hennesy
juan carlos hennesy
1 year ago

cON O SIN PROBLEMAS, las malvinas son argentinas

JuSt WoNdErInG JuSt ThInKiNg
JuSt WoNdErInG JuSt ThInKiNg
1 year ago

Any compromise solution will not be accepted for long by the Argentinians. They will simply see it as a first step towards complete annexation, the islanders’ wishes be damned. Strong parallels with Hong Kong here; you cannot share sovereignty for long with a country that despises you and cares nothing for the territory’s existing population. Besides, what incentive does Britain have in making Argentina happy? Not much in my view. May as well maintain the status quo as far as Britain is concerned, and as Britain is the dominant power here, only their opinion matters.

Vivian Hung
Vivian Hung
1 year ago

Only I ask is not having to face another war.
The world had enough.

felipe amor
felipe amor
1 year ago

Seamos honestos. Ningún gobierno británico podría jamás aceptar una soberanía conjunta, especialmente como un preludio obvio a la toma de posesión de Argentina. Sería un suicidio electoral. Sería visto como una traición a los británicos muertos en la guerra y a los deseos de los isleños.

Gil Winthorpe
Gil Winthorpe
1 year ago

Argentina couldn’t take the island by force or by referendum so there doesn’t appear to be any issue to me.

jack alexander
jack alexander
1 year ago

The example of Hong Kong would make me skeptical of Argentinian assurances surrounding joint sovereignty. (Sovereignty wasn’t joint between the UK and China in that case, but China promised Hong Kong some autonomy.)

Wayne Dano
Wayne Dano
1 year ago

it will never be “solved” because politicians will never admit to weakness or wrongdoing. Another war will not be fought as a sea assault is something that very few nations can successfully accomplish, and Argentina is definitely not one of them. Great Britain displayed utmost determination to defend the Falklands at a time of a historical low for the kingdom, both in terms of global reach and internal disrepair. Forty years later Great Britain has more than recovered in power and determination while Argentina has fallen into new historical lows. Lastly, the latest conflict in Ukraine proved to everyone that waging trivial invasions is extremely costly and there are no winners.

Tom The Greek
Tom The Greek
1 year ago

))))) I remember being taught the subject in detail in university and the conflict is difficult due to the stance of Argentina holding some noble stance on historical precedent that has expired long ago. Today, the island inhabitants have made their choice and if the option came up again then we may see if things have changed. It is extremely tiring hearing about ancient history from the perspective of states like Russia, Argentina, Serbia, etc. The facts on the ground are different today for all parties involved, and those who inhabit the disputed lands have made and continue to make their decisions.(((((

Mike gulzarlone
Mike gulzarlone
1 year ago

If the British had been able to take over the Rio de la Plata/River Plate in 1807 or so, Argentina (including Uruguay) would have become a British dominion and it would have become binational (English and Spanish) like Canada or white South Africa. In that situation, the Falklands (Or Malvinas Islands, I don’t want to be disrespectful) would have been settled by the British sometime around 1815, the capital would be called Bathurst and not Stanley due to a different British colonial secretary at the time (but at the same location), and both the capital and the islands as a whole would be up to 10 times as populated as in reality due to many more connections with the mainland. The Falklands would be an integral part of that (ex-)dominion as a territory just like Yukon, the Northwest Territories, or Nunavut in Canada, or the Northern Territory in Australia (due to smaller population than the mainland provinces). Thus, no Falklands War in 1982!

SONIA
SONIA
1 year ago

LOS ISLEÑOS NO SABEN LO QUE SE PIERDEN POR NO SER GOBERNADOS POR NOSOTROS. JAJAJAJAJA

robi
robi
1 year ago

Tenho tendência a acreditar que devem ser os actuais residentes das ilhas quem decidem que talvez a Argentina as possa comprar, oferecendo uma quantia substancial de dinheiro para viver noutro local. Todo mundo tinha seu preço.

Harry Tramell
Harry Tramell
1 year ago

The issue of condominium could be an interesting concept. Another example of this occurred in the so-called Oregon Country in the years between 1818 – 1846 with the United States and Britain. It originated over the dispute of the boundary between the United States and what would become Canada. Eventually, Britain accepted the 49 degree boundary for this part of North America. This boundary line had been accepted further east earlier.

joel smith-jones
joel smith-jones
1 year ago

I honestly don’t understand why so much weight is given to the Argentinians’ claim. Please correct me if I’m wrong, but my understanding is that the island was tussled over between competing colonial powers over the two centuries preceding 1833 and the islands were not in any way settled or used by populations on/from the South American mainland preceding European discovery. There is a possibility that pre-historic tribes from Tierra Del Fuego visited, but that has not been established. Argentina’s claim lay in Spain placing its own colonial claim on the islands into the administrative aegis Argentina’s predecessor, the Rio De La Plate, which revolted from Spain and kept the claim, later using an American pirate to claim ownership over the islands following being forced to land there after raiding the Portuguese. Britain has colonised a great number of peoples and places around the world in the course of history, but Argentine suggestions that British colonisation of the Falklands is being comparable to islands in the Caribbean or elsewhere with pre-existing populations seems a blatantly false comparison. As I understand it the British inhabitants since 1833 represent the only known permanent settlement of any people on Earth and Argentina’s case against British colonialism effectively rely on their own claim rooted in Spanish colonialism and that the islands are closer to Argentina than they are to the UK. Proximity is not much of a leg to stand on in a world that is no longer defined by powers’ spheres of influence, and more so in the digital age. Argentina’s colonial claim seem to at best equate to the UK’s, but their argument of proximity does not come remotely close to two centuries of permanent British inhabitation. I’m not British, but I am from the Anglosphere, so there’s likely some bias, but the facts seem to be fairly straight forward. Am I missing something?

Claudio Sebastián Abregu
Claudio Sebastián Abregu
1 year ago

UK illegally occupies South Atlantic islands (Malvinas, Georgias, Sandwichs). Since 1965, the UN has called the UK to discuss sovereignty over the islands. The islands were discovered by the kingdom of Spain in 1520 (Magellan) and have been Argentine since 1816 by legal inheritance.
Greetings

BIZANCIO
BIZANCIO
1 year ago

Dear Joel Smith-Jones, you are missing this and many other information
:
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pablo_Areguat%C3%AD#Malvinas

Fue el tercer y último comandante militar de las islas Malvinas como parte de las Provincias Unidas del Río de la Plata (actualmente Argentina) entre el 2 de febrero y agosto de 1824, reemplazando a Guillermo Mason.45​ Había llegado a las islas en 1823.6178

colorincoloradoestecuentoNOsehaterminado
colorincoloradoestecuentoNOsehaterminado
1 year ago

La verdad es que no se cual es la solución en el tema Malvinas.

BIZANCIO
BIZANCIO
1 year ago

Que tengamos 5 veces el PBI del R.U.

Magdalena
Magdalena
1 year ago

ROSSATI ES UN HIPÓCRITA PREVARICADOR QUE CON SUS REITERADOS E IDEOLOGIZADOS FALLOS, EN DETRIMENTO DE LOS HOMBRES QUE COMBATIERON EN EL MARCO DE LA GUERRA ANTITERRORISTA EN ARGENTINA, MUCHOS DE ELLOS HÉROES DE MALVINAS, HA CONCULCADO LA CONSTITUCIÓN NACIONAL Y TODOS LOS BAREMOS LEGALES, SIEMPRE EN FAVOR DEL FLAGELO SUBVERSIVO.
ES MÁS, CUANDO EXPRESÓ LOS DICHOS QUE SE MENCIONAN, EN ESTE ARTÍCULO, JUGABA PARA MASSA, PORQUE SE DICE PERONISTA.
GRAVÍSIMO ERROR DEL PRESIDENTE MACRI, CUANDO LO UNGIO COMO MINISTRO DE LA CORTE.

Fernando Ariel Piña
Fernando Ariel Piña
1 year ago
Reply to  Magdalena

ROSATTI, el pollo de Mauri…

BIZANCIO
BIZANCIO
1 year ago
Reply to  Magdalena

Por eso Rosatti ni siquiera es juez.

Patricio
Patricio
1 year ago

Con el enemigo, no se negocia, pero los ingleses se quedarán con Malvinas y ahora con la Antártida. Habrá que esperar los resultados de la visita y los pasos que se seguirán. Por de pronto. que los que están en la campaña antártica, vayan acumulando leña porque el Presupuesto de las FF. AA. es el de 2023, digamos, o sea, que la misma plata para el nuevo año que trae aumentos siderales y veremos que les asignan para sobrevivir.

patria_o_muerte_carajo
Reply to  Patricio

Desperdiciamos una ocasion completamente unica. En la Guerra de Malvinas, ya los teniamos liquidados.

14
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x