El verdadero James Bond ficticio de Ian Fleming

Share

  Por Anna Rubika.

El Bond de Ian Fleming no es el héroe de acción de las películas, irresistiblemente guapo y sexy, que empuña dispositivos sofisticados. Fleming quería que Bond fuera “un instrumento contundente” que sirviera a los propósitos de un departamento gubernamental. El nombre de Bond fue elegido por ser “el nombre más simple, aburrido y que suena más sencillo” que Fleming pudo encontrar. Es un personaje ambiguo, en muchos sentidos un antihéroe. Ya mató más de una vez, por encargo, antes de Casino Royale, la primera novela de Bond. 

Fleming describe a Bond en fragmentos a lo largo de las novelas. El Bond de las novelas tiene “una boca cruel” y ojos fríos. Tiene una cicatriz en la mejilla derecha. Bond bebe mucho. Ese famoso martini es un monstruo: tres tragos de ginebra y un trago de vodka con un poco de aperitivo. Eso es antes de la cena. Fuma varios paquetes de fuertes cigarrillos turcos al día. Ocasionalmente toma anfetaminas y otros estimulantes. 

Fleming no veía a su personaje como un buen o un mal tipo. Y no es una persona agradable. Bond hace comentarios racistas, sexistas y homofóbicos ocasionales.

Las películas de Bond son muy divertidas. Pero no son las novelas, que se parecen más a las duras novelas de detectives de Raymond Chandler que a las aventuras de acción de súper espías y efectos especiales que la mayoría de la gente conoce. Con Bond no sólo se vive dos veces.

 


PrisioneroEnArgentina.com

Mayo 9, 2024


 

Tags: ,

19 thoughts on “El verdadero James Bond ficticio de Ian Fleming”

    • Carlton Riggs
    • posted on May 10, 2024

    Love JB

    • Julia
    • posted on May 9, 2024

    I have just received my 3rd paycheck which said that $16,285 that I have made just in one month by working online over my laptop. This job is amazing and its regular earnings are much better than my regular office job. Join this job now and start making money online easily by just use this link….

    Detail Here……….>>>  http://Www.BizWork1.Com

    • Linus Vogt 12
    • posted on May 9, 2024

    the movies are the upgraded version of the books

    • 42
    • posted on May 9, 2024

    Rolex watch in the novels, untill Omega bought their way-in…

    • Roy Duvallier
    • posted on May 9, 2024

    In the book 007 is described as having dark hair and blue eyes

    • Harry Berg
    • posted on May 9, 2024

    James Bond is the coolest

    • Bob Brooks
    • posted on May 9, 2024

    “From Russia with Love”. Arguably the best Bond book and best Bond film, but there are lots of differences between them.

    • Lucio Sanchez
    • posted on May 9, 2024

    una hermosa fantasía que perdura desde hace décadas y por la que muchos han ganado mucha plata .

    • Frank Wambaugh
    • posted on May 9, 2024

    1954 made for tv movie. James Bond is CIA, Felix Lieter is British Secret Service and has no hook for a hand as described in the book.

    • Soldier Boy
    • posted on May 9, 2024

    Bond was based in agent Dusko Popov, Ian Fleming’s friend.

    • Burton Smith
    • posted on May 9, 2024

    The first books didn’t have gadgets.

    • Ken Bowling
    • posted on May 9, 2024

    In the Fleming novels, James Bond has blue eyes, just like Daniel Craig.

      • Mark Axos
      • posted on May 9, 2024

      Dr. No, From Russia, With Love,Thunderball, On Her Majesty’s Secret Service, & For Your Eyes Only were also mostly faithful to the novels.
      Bond’s physical description was closely matched by Sir Sean Connery & Timothy Dalton.

        • Wes Michaelson
        • posted on May 9, 2024

        Mostly Connery

    • lewis a. mackay
    • posted on May 9, 2024

    Casino Royal was the first book of it’s type that I read in one sitting, I spent six hour on the edge of my seat reading the book, not even getting up to use the bathroom, it is that intense of a novel.

    • Albert Ramsey
    • posted on May 9, 2024

    Apparently Flemming’s wife actually was the one who got Flemming to sit down and finally write the book he was always talking about writing. When he had finished it he said that he was going to dedicate it to her but she read it and said “This isn’t the kind of book you dedicate.”

      • The Situation
      • posted on May 9, 2024

      I just recently finished reading the 1953 novel. And actually, the torture from the novel was VERY different from the movie (besides the “wooden carpet beater” part). In the movie we see Bond being humorous about the whole situation and he is only hit like 5 times (in the balls). In the novel it is VERY dark, VERY serious, and VERY intense. Bond was in so much pain and so weak that he couldn’t even gather enough saliva to talk. I think he was only able to say just 1 or 2 words to Le Chiffre throughout the whole ordeal. Bond wasn’t humorous AT ALL! In fact he was so busy trying to remember the tactics of staying alive through the torture. Le Chiffre hit Bond’s body ALL OVER and for OVER 10 FREAKING MINUTES too nonstop! Bond had a large ring of sweat under his chair AND he lost a sh*t load of blood too! He even fainted from the torture! The aftermath in the movie when Bond is recovering in the nursery home he doesn’t seem too bad. However, in the novel Bond is freaking TRAUMATIZED by the torture he just went through! When he tells Mathis everything that happened to him, he starts to FREAK OUT and SWEAT WITH FEAR when he thinks about the torture Le Chiffre put him through! I’m not certain but I think the novel even said Bond had freaking NIGHTMARES about the torture!

    • Silvio Fontana
    • posted on May 9, 2024

    Que raro que las feministas no lo atacaron todavia.

    • morgan.lee
    • posted on May 9, 2024

    If they do it Fleming’s way, Bond wouldn’t be as likable…

Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *