En primer lugar me hago eco de las palabras sencillas pero no menos ciertas del camarada Mayor Zapata. Si mal no lo interpreto, quiso decir que muchos retirados de otras épocas estamos vivos y gozando de nuestra libertad, gracias a los presos políticos, que para mí siguen siendo Jefes Superiores, que están condenados a PENA DE MUERTE EN CUOTAS. Y si a ese calvario todavía le sumamos tener que convivir con narcos policías, es de imaginar lo que debe sentir nuestros Jefes detenidos. Tengo que decir para que se entienda mi posición, que una vez por TV, un par de personajes nefastos entre los que metía púa el actor fracasado De Rozas, pequeño en su época de la Familia Falcón, impulsando a un idiota, este decía que reconoció a Patti, después de 20 años, mientras estaba tabicado por su voz. Esos fueron fundamentos judiciales que se vieron por los medios de comunicación al servicio de los DDHH. Me dijo, le dije,me contaron etc etc. Dicho esto me agradecimiento a esos Jefes hoy privados de su libertad y como exprese condenados a pena de muerte en cuotas. Además del camarada Zapata coincido en este tema con lo dicho por BM. No quiero dejar de recordar al nefasto tándem DUHALDE/ARSLANIAN, millonarios estos, causantes directos de la destruccion de la Policia de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, con la colaboración del Jefe y SubJefe previo a la maldita intervención de 1997, que nos entregaron atados de pies y manos. Al Jefe ni lo nombro y el SubJefe partió. Desde ese momento se perdió uno de los mayores valores que alguna vez tuvimos, las colectas mensuales para los que caían en desgracia y sus familias. Desde Subayudante, no hubo época en que no se realizarán juntes, por camaradas que ni conocíamos pero eran Policías. En 1997 se terminó una Policia y llegamos a la actual cuyo peor engendro es la POLICIA LOCAL, de otro nefasto, el motonauta que hoy figura en un 5to puesto de la lista de la vergüenza.
[…] ¿Ha llegado el momento de que los británicos digan adiós a la monarquía? […]
Sheila Walkup
1 year ago
We have to pay for somebody else life of luxuries .
Last edited 1 year ago by Sheila Walkup
Sonia S
1 year ago
I read that King Charles III himself had republican leanings…
:D:D
hoby3
1 year ago
It is much plausible to have another Glorious Revolution than to abolished the Monarchy
Mark Axos
1 year ago
there are not a lot of good British politicians that I would want to have as President.
God save me!
1 year ago
The question is what would replace the King/Queen as a head of state. The only real alternative is a President. This will either have to be a Executive President or a Ceremonial President. The MP’s in the House of Commons will not allow an Executive President as that will mean handing power from the House of Commons to the new Executive President (The same reason as why the house of Lords is not replaced). As for a Ceremonial President what is the difference between a Ceremonial President and what we have now. Would it be worth the turmoil to change to a Ceremonial President.
Dragonslasher
1 year ago
If the monarchy was abolished-it will be a political nightmare for us in Canada. The many treaties between the various indigenous nations from the Cree to Inuits to Haudenosaunee all signed treaties to with the Crown. It will be a nightmare if the Crown was abolished because technically those treaties would be void. It means all the cities in Canada, without the Crown, would technically no longer have a right to those lands anymore unless there was a new treaty that transferred those lands from Crown ownership to the new Canadian Republic. But the details of all those treaties will be a huge endeavour in itself.
Even if they abolish the monarchy , it will take years of hardship to get back the country in track , just like they first did previously during 1649. It faced many severe challenges and consequences to be ruled under a democratic government , so abolishing of the British monarchy which has been the “heart of English” for many years would not be a good option. Instead , monarchy can flourish with the modern era only if they just try to make many significant and important changes and befit it like the Danish , Norwegian or Dutch monarchies which are currently being loved by their people. I would recommend at first to reduce the mammoth size royal expenditures and their tax issues to be funded by themselves , converting some of the unused royal estates or cottages or castles into something bloody useful like shelter centres or charity organisations and last but not the least , the royals should stop trying being snobbish and be more transparent and accessible with their subjects and citizens
declan gilbertson
1 year ago
I automatically don’t want a monarch but I have to say on the contrary, after teaching myself about the monarchy and just what they do, it comes more down to the King or Queen in power and just what they want done. I really think we are better of with a monarchy as a nation than without one, only once it’s gone will people see what is missing.
Una opinión más publicada en Apropoba (Asociación Profesional de Policías de la Provincia de Buenos Aires)
Escribe el Comisario Inspector Eduardo Moltedo.
En primer lugar me hago eco de las palabras sencillas pero no menos ciertas del camarada Mayor Zapata. Si mal no lo interpreto, quiso decir que muchos retirados de otras épocas estamos vivos y gozando de nuestra libertad, gracias a los presos políticos, que para mí siguen siendo Jefes Superiores, que están condenados a PENA DE MUERTE EN CUOTAS. Y si a ese calvario todavía le sumamos tener que convivir con narcos policías, es de imaginar lo que debe sentir nuestros Jefes detenidos. Tengo que decir para que se entienda mi posición, que una vez por TV, un par de personajes nefastos entre los que metía púa el actor fracasado De Rozas, pequeño en su época de la Familia Falcón, impulsando a un idiota, este decía que reconoció a Patti, después de 20 años, mientras estaba tabicado por su voz. Esos fueron fundamentos judiciales que se vieron por los medios de comunicación al servicio de los DDHH. Me dijo, le dije,me contaron etc etc. Dicho esto me agradecimiento a esos Jefes hoy privados de su libertad y como exprese condenados a pena de muerte en cuotas. Además del camarada Zapata coincido en este tema con lo dicho por BM. No quiero dejar de recordar al nefasto tándem DUHALDE/ARSLANIAN, millonarios estos, causantes directos de la destruccion de la Policia de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, con la colaboración del Jefe y SubJefe previo a la maldita intervención de 1997, que nos entregaron atados de pies y manos. Al Jefe ni lo nombro y el SubJefe partió. Desde ese momento se perdió uno de los mayores valores que alguna vez tuvimos, las colectas mensuales para los que caían en desgracia y sus familias. Desde Subayudante, no hubo época en que no se realizarán juntes, por camaradas que ni conocíamos pero eran Policías. En 1997 se terminó una Policia y llegamos a la actual cuyo peor engendro es la POLICIA LOCAL, de otro nefasto, el motonauta que hoy figura en un 5to puesto de la lista de la vergüenza.
Atte.
Eduardo Moltedo
Crío. Insp. (RA)
PrisioneroEnArgentina.com
Agosto 7, 2017
Tags: Alberto Fernández de Rozas, Eduardo Duhalde, Eduardo Moltedo, León Arslanián, Luis Abelardo PattiRelated Posts
APRENDER DE LA HISTORIA
◘ por Enrique Guillermo Avogadro. “Quienes se benefician del statu [...]
EN LESA NOS ENTREGAN PARA EL SACRIFICIO… ¿Y QUÉ?
♦ Por Claudio Kussman. El último martes [...]
GORRIARÁN MERLO, futuro prócer
. El ex director de la Biblioteca Nacional, Horacio [...]
[…] ¿Ha llegado el momento de que los británicos digan adiós a la monarquía? […]
We have to pay for somebody else life of luxuries .
I read that King Charles III himself had republican leanings…
:D:D
It is much plausible to have another Glorious Revolution than to abolished the Monarchy
there are not a lot of good British politicians that I would want to have as President.
The question is what would replace the King/Queen as a head of state. The only real alternative is a President. This will either have to be a Executive President or a Ceremonial President. The MP’s in the House of Commons will not allow an Executive President as that will mean handing power from the House of Commons to the new Executive President (The same reason as why the house of Lords is not replaced). As for a Ceremonial President what is the difference between a Ceremonial President and what we have now. Would it be worth the turmoil to change to a Ceremonial President.
If the monarchy was abolished-it will be a political nightmare for us in Canada.
The many treaties between the various indigenous nations from the Cree to Inuits to Haudenosaunee all signed treaties to with the Crown. It will be a nightmare if the Crown was abolished because technically those treaties would be void. It means all the cities in Canada, without the Crown, would technically no longer have a right to those lands anymore unless there was a new treaty that transferred those lands from Crown ownership to the new Canadian Republic. But the details of all those treaties will be a huge endeavour in itself.
Even if they abolish the monarchy , it will take years of hardship to get back the country in track , just like they first did previously during 1649. It faced many severe challenges and consequences to be ruled under a democratic government , so abolishing of the British monarchy which has been the “heart of English” for many years would not be a good option. Instead , monarchy can flourish with the modern era only if they just try to make many significant and important changes and befit it like the Danish , Norwegian or Dutch monarchies which are currently being loved by their people. I would recommend at first to reduce the mammoth size royal expenditures and their tax issues to be funded by themselves , converting some of the unused royal estates or cottages or castles into something bloody useful like shelter centres or charity organisations and last but not the least , the royals should stop trying being snobbish and be more transparent and accessible with their subjects and citizens
I automatically don’t want a monarch but I have to say on the contrary, after teaching myself about the monarchy and just what they do, it comes more down to the King or Queen in power and just what they want done. I really think we are better of with a monarchy as a nation than without one, only once it’s gone will people see what is missing.