Si Rusia fuera simultáneamente nuclear a todas las principales ciudades de la ciudad y la Fuerza Aérea de los Estados Unidos, los estadounidenses aún tendrían sus submarinos nucleares, pero con el presidente desaparecido, ¿quién podría autorizar esos submarinos a disparar contra Rusia?
La represalia de los Estados Unidos estaría en el aire antes de que los misiles rusos pudieran detonar. El tiempo de vuelo es de unos 30 minutos, se necesitan 15 minutos para lanzar los misiles, por lo que para cuando se disparan los misiles rusos, los misiles estadounidenses ya están a medio camino de Rusia.
Los submarinos nucleares tienen órdenes permanentes sobre qué hacer si no pueden llegar a la estructura de comando de EE. UU. No se conocen las órdenes exactas, pero en realidad, el comandante de cada submarino puede autorizar un lanzamiento, autorizado o no.
Es abrumadoramente probable que esta sea una opción abierta para ellos por las órdenes permanentes. También debe notar que debido a cómo funcionan esas cosas, no es realmente posible saber con certeza a qué apunta Rusia solo observando el lanzamiento. Entonces, todas las potencias nucleares tienen que asumir que son ellos el objetivo. Un ataque contra los Estados Unidos sería represaliado también por China, Francia y el Reino Unido.
My last pay test was $9,500 operating 12 hours per week online. My sisters buddy has been averaging 15,000 for months now and she works approximately 20 hours every week. I can not accept as true with how easy it become as soon as i tried it out.
Legt man die Erfahrungen mit der jüngsten militärischen Leistungsfähigkeit Russlands zugrunde, wäre Putin selbstmörderisch, wenn er irgendjemanden aus der NATO angreifen würde. Die NATO hat der Ukraine etwas geholfen, aber das ist nichts im Vergleich zu dem, was die NATO selbst tun könnte, wenn sie alles, was sie hatte, gegen Russland einsetzen würde. Ich denke, dass 90 % der russischen Atomwaffen sowieso scheitern würden, da alles, was sie haben, veraltet und fehlerhaft zu sein scheint.
Una opción que tiene Putin y de la que nadie habla es el último ataque asimétrico contra la OTAN. Los rusos podrían utilizar armas nucleares tácticas en todos los yacimientos petrolíferos de la OPEP de Oriente Medio y en las arenas bituminosas de Alberta. Teniendo en cuenta la cantidad de petróleo que las naciones de la OTAN obtienen de la OPEP, hay muchas posibilidades de que esto ponga de rodillas a las economías de los países de la OTAN.
Not only Russia. This scenario would be a prime opportunity for China to step in as well as North Korea. As Korea, China stepped in after WWII. WHERE China has like 12 times the population of the U.S., their government would probably be glad to reduce the number of people, where they could improve the standard of living for many. They may not be as tech savvy, but neither was Iraq/Afghanistan. Which it might be good to start building up the U.S. ships and planes and making sure its done right, where a plane or ship is delivered it will perform per spec or better, if not, military rule handles inferior staff. It might be good to get boycotts initiated again, where young boys learn outdoor skills while learning shooting, archery, foraging for food where it’s fun, along with swimming. Oh, then teach actual tactics using paintball, the kids would have a field day. Improve their athleticism as well as just having fun. It’d give a leg up should a draft be needed. They’d probably enjoy to do a skydive. Then how to use a compass and a map. Everything to give them familiarity that’d allow them to learn more as well as faster should they be required in the military. Which as teenagers, that stuff is fun. Not where you have to do it, but enjoy and look forward to doing it. Even bring Weblos back. Brownies and girlscouts could get familiar with air pistols and rifles, but learn first aid, some nursing, cooking skills, things girls generally enjoy and are good at. Not to mention it keeping them off the street by choice, where they have somewheres to go. We really need to invest in our youth, even if not for war! Things they enjoy that will help them in life as well. Playing ball, that’s for some, but providing skills for living would help much more, where they get to have fun doing it. Just like guys, they can be taught how to cook and cook well, simply give Cajun recipes. When hungry, all that will taste even better. But,they’d have somewheres to go besides the streets,that’s safe or generally safe, minor cuts, bruises, sprains could happen, where they can be introduced to first aid. A generation before me had all this. I never heard anything negative, always positive. Of course the news can take an isolated events and make it sound like the entire nation is going under, where they destroy a moral fabric that encourages character and confidence. Look how many kids get into trouble now where there’s nothing for them to do. It’s ashame. Then there’s things like 4-H and F.F.A. which teaches skills at some places. As welding, small engine repair, carpentry, it’s all part of what’s in agriculture. Which if a world War comes, knowing how to grow plants could be a big help.
The scenario doesn’t take into consideration what the Chinese response would be to a nato attack on Russia,ie, whether or not there exist a mutual defense pact signed between them. The US and NATO could be facing two enemies instead of one.
¿Un ataque ruso a los territorios estadounidenses en Alaska o las islas del Pacífico provocaría la aplicación del Tratado Interamericano de Asistencia Recíproca y arrastraría así a la mayoría de los países latinoamericanos al conflicto?
Si una bomba nuclear se dirigiera hacia Estados Unidos desde Rusia, y si los residentes fueran advertidos inmediatamente del ataque, se estima que tendrían unos 30 minutos o menos para refugiarse. Eso significa que, en el peor de los casos, no hay tiempo para planificar en el momento.
Ich erinnere mich, dass es 1993 in Russland den Hit „Don’t play the Fool, America!“ gab. (Не валяй дурака, Америка!), in dem sie fordern, Alaska an Russland zu geben. Dem Lied nach zu urteilen, halten die Russen den Kauf Alaskas für etwas Leichtfertiges und träumen immer noch davon, es zurückzugeben. Sie träumen jedoch davon, jedes Territorium, das sie besaßen, zurückzugeben. Auch wenn die Eroberung des Landes – wie bei der Insel Gotland – zwei Wochen dauerte. Es ist also nicht verwunderlich.
The first is what if China moves to attack Taiwan at the same time Russia moves against NATO and the US? What if North Korea decides that this situation was one they should take advantage of and started attacking South Korea. We’d find ourselves in the middle of a three front war. I have a feeling that Putin will demonstrate just how insane he is when Russia detonates a nuclear air burst away from the US, NATO and Russia, just to let us know that the will launch against us if we don’t withdraw?
The recent test of the Uk’s cellular telephone system to announce a public service “emergency” message was brought forward in the light of the growing west/east tensions. The system is totally capable of shutting down all civilian lower-priority / domestic messages (i.e. you will not be able to ‘phone your kids or order pizza) – whilst retaining a communications grid for all civil defence operations, (CBRN etc) governmental (regional and local) and assorted military services. The same applies with the internet, although this cannot be tested; The military users require some common carrier internet access as a military/governmental comms “bearer” traffic path, but mainly as a fallback – in case other systems are failed.. Nevertheless, plans are already afoot to limit IP-ranges, selected Ips (shutdown of most social network domains), selected country domains and direct server access. In other words, we are already on a war-preparation footing and the disguised “emergency tone and messages” was a simple UK-wide test of something much deeper in preparation and roll-out.
•
Si Rusia fuera simultáneamente nuclear a todas las principales ciudades de la ciudad y la Fuerza Aérea de los Estados Unidos, los estadounidenses aún tendrían sus submarinos nucleares, pero con el presidente desaparecido, ¿quién podría autorizar esos submarinos a disparar contra Rusia?
La represalia de los Estados Unidos estaría en el aire antes de que los misiles rusos pudieran detonar. El tiempo de vuelo es de unos 30 minutos, se necesitan 15 minutos para lanzar los misiles, por lo que para cuando se disparan los misiles rusos, los misiles estadounidenses ya están a medio camino de Rusia.
Los submarinos nucleares tienen órdenes permanentes sobre qué hacer si no pueden llegar a la estructura de comando de EE. UU. No se conocen las órdenes exactas, pero en realidad, el comandante de cada submarino puede autorizar un lanzamiento, autorizado o no.
Es abrumadoramente probable que esta sea una opción abierta para ellos por las órdenes permanentes. También debe notar que debido a cómo funcionan esas cosas, no es realmente posible saber con certeza a qué apunta Rusia solo observando el lanzamiento. Entonces, todas las potencias nucleares tienen que asumir que son ellos el objetivo. Un ataque contra los Estados Unidos sería represaliado también por China, Francia y el Reino Unido.
PrisioneroEnArgentina.com
Diciembre 14, 2023
Tags: Estados Unidos de América, Guerra Nuclear, Misil, RusiaRelated Posts
Donald Trump
♣ Por Isalys Lozada. ¡Así que ahora Trump [...]
El Impacto Humano de Stalingrado
◘ Por Cyd Ollack. Stalingrado no fue una [...]
Viajes en el tiempo y batallas de robots
♣ El excomandante en jefe de las Fuerzas Armadas [...]
18 thoughts on “¿Y si Rusia atacara cada ciudad principal de Estados Unidos?”
-
- Carlos de Ovidio
- posted on December 15, 2023
-
- Julia
- posted on December 15, 2023
-
- racinguista mata mil
- posted on December 15, 2023
-
- VOLKER A.
- posted on December 15, 2023
-
- pedro javier henrique
- posted on December 15, 2023
-
- michael stone-jones
- posted on December 15, 2023
-
- Roy Sykes
- posted on December 15, 2023
-
- daniel_lamonega
- posted on December 15, 2023
-
- dante annale
- posted on December 15, 2023
-
- marcelo moyano
- posted on December 15, 2023
-
- Hansi Gtaad
- posted on December 15, 2023
-
- Joe Republic
- posted on December 15, 2023
-
- Xandor Weiss
- posted on December 15, 2023
-
- Colin Hernandez
- posted on December 15, 2023
-
- Somos derechos y humanos
- posted on December 15, 2023
-
- ANGELA LORENZO
- posted on December 14, 2023
-
- T.k. Carlson
- posted on December 14, 2023
-
- Hal Thibodeaux
- posted on December 14, 2023
CommentSeria de terror.
My last pay test was $9,500 operating 12 hours per week online. My sisters buddy has been averaging 15,000 for months now and she works approximately 20 hours every week. I can not accept as true with how easy it become as soon as i tried it out.
This is what do———————->>> http://Www.BizWork1.Com
No creo que Rusia se atreva jamás a atacar a Estados Unidos.
Legt man die Erfahrungen mit der jüngsten militärischen Leistungsfähigkeit Russlands zugrunde, wäre Putin selbstmörderisch, wenn er irgendjemanden aus der NATO angreifen würde.
Die NATO hat der Ukraine etwas geholfen, aber das ist nichts im Vergleich zu dem, was die NATO selbst tun könnte, wenn sie alles, was sie hatte, gegen Russland einsetzen würde.
Ich denke, dass 90 % der russischen Atomwaffen sowieso scheitern würden, da alles, was sie haben, veraltet und fehlerhaft zu sein scheint.
Una opción que tiene Putin y de la que nadie habla es el último ataque asimétrico contra la OTAN. Los rusos podrían utilizar armas nucleares tácticas en todos los yacimientos petrolíferos de la OPEP de Oriente Medio y en las arenas bituminosas de Alberta. Teniendo en cuenta la cantidad de petróleo que las naciones de la OTAN obtienen de la OPEP, hay muchas posibilidades de que esto ponga de rodillas a las economías de los países de la OTAN.
Not only Russia. This scenario would be a prime opportunity for China to step in as well as North Korea. As Korea, China stepped in after WWII. WHERE China has like 12 times the population of the U.S., their government would probably be glad to reduce the number of people, where they could improve the standard of living for many. They may not be as tech savvy, but neither was Iraq/Afghanistan.
Which it might be good to start building up the U.S. ships and planes and making sure its done right, where a plane or ship is delivered it will perform per spec or better, if not, military rule handles inferior staff.
It might be good to get boycotts initiated again, where young boys learn outdoor skills while learning shooting, archery, foraging for food where it’s fun, along with swimming. Oh, then teach actual tactics using paintball, the kids would have a field day. Improve their athleticism as well as just having fun. It’d give a leg up should a draft be needed. They’d probably enjoy to do a skydive. Then how to use a compass and a map. Everything to give them familiarity that’d allow them to learn more as well as faster should they be required in the military. Which as teenagers, that stuff is fun. Not where you have to do it, but enjoy and look forward to doing it. Even bring Weblos back.
Brownies and girlscouts could get familiar with air pistols and rifles, but learn first aid, some nursing, cooking skills, things girls generally enjoy and are good at.
Not to mention it keeping them off the street by choice, where they have somewheres to go.
We really need to invest in our youth, even if not for war! Things they enjoy that will help them in life as well. Playing ball, that’s for some, but providing skills for living would help much more, where they get to have fun doing it. Just like guys, they can be taught how to cook and cook well, simply give Cajun recipes. When hungry, all that will taste even better.
But,they’d have somewheres to go besides the streets,that’s safe or generally safe, minor cuts, bruises, sprains could happen, where they can be introduced to first aid.
A generation before me had all this. I never heard anything negative, always positive. Of course the news can take an isolated events and make it sound like the entire nation is going under, where they destroy a moral fabric that encourages character and confidence. Look how many kids get into trouble now where there’s nothing for them to do. It’s ashame. Then there’s things like 4-H and F.F.A. which teaches skills at some places. As welding, small engine repair, carpentry, it’s all part of what’s in agriculture. Which if a world War comes, knowing how to grow plants could be a big help.
The scenario doesn’t take into consideration what the Chinese response would be to a nato attack on Russia,ie, whether or not there exist a mutual defense pact signed between them. The US and NATO could be facing two enemies instead of one.
¿Un ataque ruso a los territorios estadounidenses en Alaska o las islas del Pacífico provocaría la aplicación del Tratado Interamericano de Asistencia Recíproca y arrastraría así a la mayoría de los países latinoamericanos al conflicto?
Si una bomba nuclear se dirigiera hacia Estados Unidos desde Rusia, y si los residentes fueran advertidos inmediatamente del ataque, se estima que tendrían unos 30 minutos o menos para refugiarse. Eso significa que, en el peor de los casos, no hay tiempo para planificar en el momento.
No va a haber tiempo.
Ich erinnere mich, dass es 1993 in Russland den Hit „Don’t play the Fool, America!“ gab. (Не валяй дурака, Америка!), in dem sie fordern, Alaska an Russland zu geben. Dem Lied nach zu urteilen, halten die Russen den Kauf Alaskas für etwas Leichtfertiges und träumen immer noch davon, es zurückzugeben. Sie träumen jedoch davon, jedes Territorium, das sie besaßen, zurückzugeben. Auch wenn die Eroberung des Landes – wie bei der Insel Gotland – zwei Wochen dauerte. Es ist also nicht verwunderlich.
The first is what if China moves to attack Taiwan at the same time Russia moves against NATO and the US? What if North Korea decides that this situation was one they should take advantage of and started attacking South Korea. We’d find ourselves in the middle of a three front war. I have a feeling that Putin will demonstrate just how insane he is when Russia detonates a nuclear air burst away from the US, NATO and Russia, just to let us know that the will launch against us if we don’t withdraw?
The recent test of the Uk’s cellular telephone system to announce a public service “emergency” message was brought forward in the light of the growing west/east tensions. The system is totally capable of shutting down all civilian lower-priority / domestic messages (i.e. you will not be able to ‘phone your kids or order pizza) – whilst retaining a communications grid for all civil defence operations, (CBRN etc) governmental (regional and local) and assorted military services. The same applies with the internet, although this cannot be tested; The military users require some common carrier internet access as a military/governmental comms “bearer” traffic path, but mainly as a fallback – in case other systems are failed.. Nevertheless, plans are already afoot to limit IP-ranges, selected Ips (shutdown of most social network domains), selected country domains and direct server access. In other words, we are already on a war-preparation footing and the disguised “emergency tone and messages” was a simple UK-wide test of something much deeper in preparation and roll-out.
I think our missile system are enough.
Lo primero que van a atacar es Nueva Yorke
Recemos para fque esto no llegue a opcurrir nunca . Es lamentable que el avance cientifico haya logrado crear armas de destrucion de la humanidad .
Now I will have nightmares
The most horrible scenario